Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Supply of firewood for the needs of the municipality of Dienvidkurzeme

Open
Deadline
6 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
169169
Value
€50,000
Location
Kurzeme, Latvia
Published
March 26, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Tender Opening

April 10, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€50,000
Duration
4 months
Location
Kurzeme
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€24,627
Avg. Bids
2.3
Competition
Low
SME Winners
100%
2,503 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Supply of firewood for the needs of the municipality of Dienvidkurzeme

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

70%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for firewood supply to Dienvidkurzeme Municipality presents a moderate competition opportunity. A winning strategy will focus on demonstrating unwavering compliance with technical and financial requirements, coupled with a clear articulation of reliable supply chain management. Given the absence of explicit evaluation criteria, a proactive approach to highlighting value and minimizing perceived risk is crucial.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable and consistent supply of quality firewood for the 2026/2027 heating season.

Unwavering compliance with all tender requirements and legal obligations.

Cost-effective solution with transparent pricing.

Key Opportunities
Lack of specified evaluation criteria allows for proactive value proposition.
Focus on logistical efficiency and regional presence within Dienvidkurzeme.
Opportunity to differentiate through superior customer service and communication, even without explicit social/innovative aspects.
Key Challenges
Absence of explicit evaluation criteria makes it difficult to optimize bid scoring.

Focus on demonstrating excellence across all mandatory and implied requirements. Emphasize reliability, quality, and competitive pricing as key value drivers. Assume price and technical compliance will be paramount.

Potential for price-driven competition due to the lack of other explicit evaluation factors.

Develop a cost-effective pricing strategy that remains profitable while being competitive. Clearly articulate the value proposition beyond just price, focusing on reliability and quality to justify the offer.

Ensuring complete understanding and adherence to all detailed requirements within 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' and 'Nolikums'.

Conduct a thorough document review by legal and procurement specialists. Create a compliance matrix to track all requirements and ensure they are addressed in the bid.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An established, reliable supplier of firewood with a proven track record of consistent quality and timely delivery. The ideal bidder possesses robust logistical capabilities within the LV003 region, sufficient financial stability to meet contract demands, and a commitment to operational excellence. Experience with public sector contracts is advantageous but not mandatory.
Key Requirements
Compliance with mandatory exclusion grounds
Demonstration of eligibility under Latvian legislation
Meeting technical specifications for firewood supply (as detailed in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija')
Meeting financial requirements (as detailed in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija')
Timely submission of the application form ('Pielikumi') by the deadline
Supply for the 2026/2027 heating season (as per 'Līguma projekts')
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated capacity for consistent, high-volume supply throughout the entire heating season.
Proactive communication and transparent reporting on delivery status.
A clear and concise proposal that directly addresses all stated requirements with minimal ambiguity.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider a statement on responsible sourcing of firewood, emphasizing sustainable forestry practices if applicable. This can be a subtle differentiator.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Capability (Firewood Supply)

Provide detailed specifications of the firewood (type, moisture content, dimensions) that precisely match or exceed the requirements in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija'. Include evidence of sourcing and quality control processes.

Financial Offer

Present a clear, competitive, and well-justified price. Ensure all costs are accounted for and that the offer is sustainable for the duration of the contract. Highlight any potential cost savings or efficiencies.

Eligibility and Exclusion Grounds

Thoroughly review and address all mandatory exclusion grounds. Provide all necessary documentation to prove eligibility under Latvian legislation. This is a pass/fail criterion and must be flawless.

Recommendations6
Thoroughly Analyze 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija'
CriticalHigh effort

This document contains the core technical and financial requirements, as well as exclusion conditions. A deep understanding is paramount for a compliant bid.

Ensures bid meets all mandatory criteria, avoiding disqualification.
Assume Price and Technical Compliance are Key
HighMed effort

Without explicit weighting, assume the contracting authority will prioritize a compliant technical offer at a competitive price. Focus on demonstrating both.

Maximizes chances of success by addressing likely evaluation priorities.
Highlight Supply Chain Reliability
MediumMed effort

Emphasize the bidder's ability to guarantee consistent delivery of the required volume of firewood throughout the 4-month contract period, especially for the 2026/2027 heating season.

Builds confidence in the bidder's capability to fulfill the contract.
Complete Application Form Accurately
CriticalMed effort

Ensure the 'Pielikumi' (application form) is filled out completely and accurately, as it is the primary submission document.

Prevents administrative disqualification.
Clarify Ambiguities with Contracting Authority
HighLow effort

If any aspect of the tender documents, particularly 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' or 'Nolikums', is unclear, submit formal clarification requests within the specified timeframe.

Reduces the risk of misinterpretation and non-compliance.
Consider Sustainable Sourcing Statement
LowLow effort

If feasible, include a brief statement on responsible sourcing of firewood, even if not explicitly requested. This can be a subtle positive signal.

May offer a minor competitive edge or positive perception.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most reliable and cost-effective solution for ensuring the Dienvidkurzeme Municipality has a consistent supply of quality firewood for the upcoming heating season. Focus on operational excellence and a proven ability to meet demand without disruption.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

9 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--[Application form for participation is provided in 'Pielikumi']
--[Submission deadline: 2026-04-10T09:00:00]
--[Regulations for the tender procedure are detailed in 'Nolikums']
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[Specific exclusion grounds are detailed in the 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' document]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--[Bidders must be able to participate in public procurement as per Latvian legislation]
--[Bidders must not be subject to exclusion grounds]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--[Requirements for the supply of firewood are detailed in the 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' document]
--[The supply must be for the 2026/2027 heating season as per 'Līguma projekts']
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[Specific financial requirements are detailed in the 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' document]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
169169_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260326052705.pdf -- 97.1 KB

This document outlines the tender requirements for the supply of firewood for the Dienvidkurzeme Municipality, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial offer requirements, and evaluation criteria.

PielikumiDOC
1.pielikums_pieteikums_1.doc -- 70.5 KB

This document is an application form for participation in a public procurement tender for the supply of firewood.

Līguma projektsDOC
5.pielikums_ Liguma_projekts.docx -- 43.0 KB

This document contains a draft contract for the supply of firewood to the Dienvidkurzeme municipality for the 2026/2027 heating season, outlining the terms, conditions, and responsibilities of both the buyer and seller.

NolikumsDOC
NOLIKUMS_DKNP_2026_16.doc -- 176.5 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender procedure for the supply of firewood for municipal needs in Dienvidkurzeme, including requirements for bidders, submission procedures, and technical specifications.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open tender procedure for the supply of firewood for the Dienvidkurzeme Municipality, with a submission deadline of April 10, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for firewood supply is generally well-structured with clear basic information and attached documents. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and has potential issues with document access, impacting its overall fairness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of an open procedure. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the available information.

Clarity80/100

The description of the supply is clear, and key requirements are referenced in attached documents. However, the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria within the main notice reduces overall clarity for bidders.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. All essential documents (application form, regulations, contract draft, technical requirements) are attached. The contract duration is specified.

Fairness85/100

The tender discloses the estimated value and uses an e-procurement system. Requirements are detailed in separate documents, which is standard. However, the 'Issues' section flags 'Restricted document access,' which, if true, would significantly impact fairness. Assuming this is a technical issue and not intentional restriction, the criteria appear objective.

Restricted document access (potential)
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement and provides URLs for documents. The contract start date is implied by the contract duration and tender validity. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and the contract duration is relatively short.

Financing information not explicitly detailed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. Dates are logically sequenced (Reveal, Opening, Submission Deadline).

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU funded.

No green procurement mentioned
No social criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear basic information and title
All essential documents attached
Use of e-procurement system
Reasonable deadlines and value disclosure

Concerns

Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Potential restricted document access
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Clarify evaluation criteria within the main tender notice or ensure all documents are easily accessible.
2. Address any potential document access restrictions to ensure full transparency.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability or social criteria in future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline