Skip to main content
Tenders

Contract for Security Services Including Static Guarding, Emergency Response and Keyholding

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
020246-2026
Value
£720,000
Location
Northumberland and Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 06, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 31, 2026

Budget
£720,000
Duration
25 months
Location
Northumberland and Tyne and Wear
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The Council is looking to appoint a suitably qualified and experienced Contractor to deliver keyholding, emergency response, static guarding and property access in support of its existing arrangements for Building Management.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for security services is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on sustainability aspects.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender follows an open procedure and specifies a CPV code, indicating general regulatory compliance. The deadline, while potentially tight, is provided. No disputes are noted. The primary concern is the absence of specified evaluation criteria, which is a key component of a transparent legal process.

No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The description of the required security services is clear and concise. The AI-extracted requirements list key areas to be addressed by bidders. However, the lack of document content and specified evaluation criteria reduces overall clarity.

No document content available
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. The submission deadline and contract start date are also specified. The main deficiency is the lack of accessible tender documents with content.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, suggesting a fair process. The estimated value is disclosed, and the procedure is standard. There are no immediate indications of requirements tailored to specific companies. The lack of document content and specified evaluation criteria could be perceived as a minor fairness issue, as bidders may not fully understand the assessment basis.

Practicality65/100

The tender provides a contract start date and duration. However, the 'Issues' section flags 'No e-submission', which significantly impacts practicality. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and the availability of document URLs is not confirmed.

No e-submission
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided are logical within the context of a tender process.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and CPV code specified
Estimated value and contract duration disclosed
Open procedure

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
No e-submission indicated
Lack of sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria for bidders.
2. Provide access to full tender documents with content.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and platform.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline