Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Modernization of heating and domestic hot water installations in residential buildings at Ogrodowa 56 and Ogrodowa 67 streets in Warsaw

Open
Deadline
8 days left
April 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00175381/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Warszawski stołeczny, Poland
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 13, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Warszawski stołeczny
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Modernization of heating and domestic hot water installations in residential buildings at Ogrodowa 56 and Ogrodowa 67 streets in Warsaw

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender presents a straightforward modernization project for heating and hot water systems in residential buildings. A winning strategy will focus on demonstrating strong technical capability, competitive pricing, and meticulous adherence to submission requirements, as evaluation criteria are unspecified, implying price and compliance are paramount.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable and Cost-Effective Modernization of Essential Building Systems.

Seamless Project Execution with Minimal Disruption to Residents.

Key Opportunities
Low Estimated Value Suggests Price Sensitivity
Absence of Complex Evaluation Criteria Simplifies Strategy
Direct Communication Channels Provided
Key Challenges
Unspecified Evaluation Criteria

Assume a price-driven evaluation with a strong emphasis on compliance. Ensure all mandatory requirements are met flawlessly and prepare a highly competitive financial offer. Document all technical capabilities thoroughly to meet potential implicit quality expectations.

Potential for High Competition Due to Simplicity

Focus on meticulous bid preparation, ensuring zero errors in documentation. Differentiate through a slightly more detailed technical proposal that highlights efficiency and reliability, even if not explicitly scored, to build confidence.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A small to medium-sized enterprise (SME) with a proven track record in plumbing and heating installations for residential properties, particularly within the Warsaw area. The ideal bidder will have a lean operational structure allowing for competitive pricing and a highly organized administrative team capable of precise document submission.
Key Requirements
Compliance with Mandatory Exclusion Grounds
Meeting Eligibility Requirements
Demonstrating Technical Capability
Satisfying Financial Requirements
Accurate and Complete Submission
Key Discriminators
A highly competitive and well-justified price.
Demonstrated experience with similar public sector residential building projects in Warsaw.
A clear and concise technical proposal that outlines efficient installation methods and minimal resident disruption.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider a brief mention of commitment to local employment or waste reduction during installation, framed as good practice rather than a formal commitment, to subtly enhance the bid's appeal.
Bid Focus Areas
PriceLikely High (Implicit)

Conduct thorough cost analysis to offer the most competitive price without compromising quality or profitability. Consider economies of scale if the bidder has existing resources.

ComplianceCritical

Scrutinize every requirement in the SWZ and draft contract. Ensure all forms are completed accurately, all requested documents are attached in the correct format, and all mandatory exclusion grounds are addressed proactively.

Technical CapabilityHigh (Implicit)

Provide clear evidence of past successful projects of similar scope and complexity. Highlight the qualifications and experience of the key personnel who will be assigned to the project.

Recommendations5
Meticulous Compliance Check
CriticalHigh effort

Thoroughly review all mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements. Ensure all documentation is complete, accurate, and submitted in the specified format via e-Zamówienia.

Avoids immediate disqualification.
Aggressive Pricing Strategy
CriticalMed effort

Given the unspecified evaluation criteria and low estimated value, adopt a highly competitive pricing strategy. Ensure the price is realistic and sustainable, but aim to be the most attractive financial offer.

Maximizes chances of winning if price is a primary factor.
Highlight Project Management Efficiency
HighMed effort

In the technical proposal, emphasize efficient project management, clear communication protocols, and a plan for minimizing disruption to residents. This can be a subtle differentiator even without explicit scoring.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to deliver smoothly.
Utilize Clarification Process
MediumLow effort

If any aspect of the SWZ or draft contract is unclear, use the official clarification process via e-Zamówienia. This demonstrates diligence and can help avoid submission errors.

Reduces risk of misinterpretation and errors.
Confirm e-Zamówienia Proficiency
MediumLow effort

Ensure the bidding team is fully proficient with the e-Zamówienia platform, including submission procedures and technical requirements for electronic documents, to prevent last-minute technical issues.

Ensures successful and timely submission.
Competitive Positioning
Position as a highly efficient and cost-effective provider of essential building system upgrades. Emphasize reliability and a straightforward approach to project execution, appealing to the likely price-sensitive nature of the contracting authority.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de8bfc-3761-deb8-5fad-950001e72029.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice for construction works involving the modernization of heating and domestic hot water installations in residential buildings at Ogrodowa 56 and 67 in Warsaw.

projektowane postanowienia umowy.7zZIP
projektowane postanowienia umowy.7z

This document contains the draft contract for the modernization of heating and domestic hot water installations in residential buildings at Ogrodowa 56 and 67 in Warsaw.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for modernization of heating and hot water installations is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable set of requirements. However, the absence of disclosed value and evaluation criteria, along with a potentially short submission deadline, slightly impacts its overall quality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement practices with a clear CPV code and location. The procedure type is not specified, which is a minor omission. The submission deadline, while active, might be considered short given the scope of work, potentially impacting legal compliance if it hinders fair competition. No disputes or suspensions are noted.

Potentially short submission deadline
Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear and concise. The AI-extracted requirements cover standard categories. The availability of multiple documents, including a contract draft and technical specifications, contributes to clarity. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant clarity issue.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and CPV code. The submission deadline is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the contract duration is missing, which are key elements for completeness. Seven tender documents are available, which is a positive aspect.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', indicating a modern and accessible process. The division into parts is a positive characteristic for fairness. All documents appear to be accessible. There are no obvious requirements tailored to specific companies. The lack of disclosed value and evaluation criteria could indirectly affect fairness by making it harder for bidders to assess the opportunity and prepare competitive bids.

Practicality65/100

The tender is active and uses e-procurement. However, the 'No e-submission' flag suggests a potential manual submission process, which reduces practicality. The contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent. The duration of the contract is also missing, impacting practical planning for bidders.

No e-submission indicated
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The CPV code and location are consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of an active tender. The 'Missing reveal date' is a minor inconsistency.

Missing reveal date
Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender details. The tender is not flagged as EU funded. This indicates a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of works
Multiple tender documents available
E-Procurement indicated
Division into parts

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Potentially short submission deadline
No e-submission indicated

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Confirm and facilitate e-submission for improved practicality.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline