Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Modernization of central heating and domestic hot water installations in residential buildings at ul. Ogrodowa 56 and Ogrodowa 67 in Warsaw

Open
Deadline
16 days left
April 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00175381/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Warszawski stołeczny, Poland
Published
March 21, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 13, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Warszawski stołeczny
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Modernization of central heating and domestic hot water installations in residential buildings at ul. Ogrodowa 56 and Ogrodowa 67 in Warsaw

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de8bfc-3761-deb8-5fad-950001e72029.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice for construction works involving the modernization of heating and domestic hot water installations in residential buildings at Ogrodowa 56 and 67 in Warsaw.

projektowane postanowienia umowy.7zZIP
projektowane postanowienia umowy.7z

This document contains the draft contract for the modernization of heating and domestic hot water installations in residential buildings at Ogrodowa 56 and 67 in Warsaw.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for modernization of heating and hot water installations is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable set of requirements. However, the absence of disclosed value and evaluation criteria, along with a potentially short submission deadline, slightly impacts its overall quality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement practices with a clear CPV code and location. The procedure type is not specified, which is a minor omission. The submission deadline, while active, might be considered short given the scope of work, potentially impacting legal compliance if it hinders fair competition. No disputes or suspensions are noted.

Potentially short submission deadline
Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear and concise. The AI-extracted requirements cover standard categories. The availability of multiple documents, including a contract draft and technical specifications, contributes to clarity. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant clarity issue.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and CPV code. The submission deadline is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the contract duration is missing, which are key elements for completeness. Seven tender documents are available, which is a positive aspect.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', indicating a modern and accessible process. The division into parts is a positive characteristic for fairness. All documents appear to be accessible. There are no obvious requirements tailored to specific companies. The lack of disclosed value and evaluation criteria could indirectly affect fairness by making it harder for bidders to assess the opportunity and prepare competitive bids.

Practicality65/100

The tender is active and uses e-procurement. However, the 'No e-submission' flag suggests a potential manual submission process, which reduces practicality. The contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent. The duration of the contract is also missing, impacting practical planning for bidders.

No e-submission indicated
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The CPV code and location are consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of an active tender. The 'Missing reveal date' is a minor inconsistency.

Missing reveal date
Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender details. The tender is not flagged as EU funded. This indicates a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of works
Multiple tender documents available
E-Procurement indicated
Division into parts

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Potentially short submission deadline
No e-submission indicated

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Confirm and facilitate e-submission for improved practicality.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline