Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Amgros 2027 2.1303.b

Open
Deadline
45 days left
May 19, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
00192038-2026
Value
kr6,060,000
Location
Hovedstaden, Denmark
Published
March 28, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

May 12, 2026

Submission Deadline

May 19, 2026

Budget
kr6,060,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Hovedstaden
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Amgros I/S (Amgros) is a joint venture with the 5 regions as stakeholders. Amgros wishes to enter into framework agreements for the medicinal products listed in the individual sub-contracts below, with the aim of supplying the stakeholders' hospital pharmacies with medicinal products and potentially reselling to the Faroe Islands and Greenland. Amgros resells the medicinal products to the hospital pharmacies at Amgros' purchase price plus a markup. The framework agreements are non-exclusive. The framework agreements are entered into without an obligation to purchase, and the hospital pharmacies in

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

9 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-05-19 10:00:00.
--The tender is an Open Procedure.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must be able to supply the pharmaceuticals listed in the individual sub-contracts.
--The framework agreements are non-exclusive.
--The framework agreements are entered into without a purchase obligation.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific technical capability requirements are detailed in the provided text.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.

Login
75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a disclosed estimated value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and technical/financial requirements, impacting completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender follows an open procedure and specifies a CPV code, indicating general regulatory compliance. Deadlines are provided, though their reasonableness is not fully assessable without context. No disputes are reported. The procedure type is 'competition' which is a bit vague but acceptable.

Clarity80/100

The description of the tender's purpose and the nature of the framework agreements is clear. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed technical/financial requirements leaves ambiguity for potential bidders.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadline. However, crucial details regarding technical capabilities, financial requirements, and contract duration are missing from the provided text, reducing overall completeness.

No specific technical capability requirements are detailed
No specific financial requirements are detailed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, and the framework agreements are non-exclusive and without purchase obligation, promoting fairness. Access to documents is facilitated through an external portal. No requirements appear tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting electronic submission. However, the 'No e-submission' flag in the checks contradicts this. The absence of a contract start date and financing information limits practical assessment. Document URLs are provided for external access.

No e-submission (contradictory flag)
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadline are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. Dates appear logical, with the submission deadline well after the notice publication date.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of focus on these areas.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization details
Estimated value and CPV code provided
Open procedure with non-exclusive framework agreements
Documents available for access

Concerns

Missing specific evaluation criteria
Lack of detailed technical and financial requirements
Ambiguity regarding e-submission process

Recommendations

1. Specify detailed evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
2. Include comprehensive technical and financial requirements for bidders.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and confirm its availability.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline