Skip to main content
Tenders

Co-op Academy Swinton - New 3-G Pitch Required

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
019942-2026
Value
£540,000
Location
United Kingdom
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 05, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 25, 2026

Budget
£540,000
Duration
3 months
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Co-op Academy Swinton - new 3-G pitch required, with 1 contractor to Design and build covered by JCT contract.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

7 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Deadline: 2026-03-27T00:00:00
--Duration: 3 months
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements listed.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Design and build a new 3-G pitch.
--Covered by JCT contract.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Value: 540000.0 EUR

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a new 3-G pitch is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a disclosed value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on submission methods, impacting its practicality and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements for a below-threshold open competition. A CPV code is provided, and there are no reported disputes. The deadline, while potentially short, is within a reasonable range for this type of procedure. The absence of a reveal date is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The description of the required work (design and build of a 3-G pitch under a JCT contract) is clear. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria leaves potential bidders uncertain about how their submissions will be assessed, reducing overall clarity.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the absence of content within the tender documents and the lack of specified evaluation criteria mean that crucial details for bidders are missing.

No document content available
Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, which promotes fairness. The value is disclosed, and the criteria, while not fully specified, are not tailored to specific companies. The lack of explicit e-submission requirements is a minor point, but the overall process appears objective.

Practicality65/100

The tender's practicality is hindered by the lack of explicit e-submission instructions and the absence of content in the available documents, making it difficult for bidders to prepare and submit their proposals efficiently. The deadline may also be tight for a design and build project.

No e-submission specified
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation requirements. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of focus on these important sustainability dimensions.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and estimated value disclosed
CPV code provided
Open competition procedure

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
Lack of explicit e-submission instructions
No sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria for bidders.
2. Upload full tender documentation with detailed specifications.
3. Clarify e-submission procedures and platform.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline