Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Oldham Green New Deal Partnership

Open
Deadline
604 days left
November 29, 2027
Contract Details
Category
Restricted Procedure
Reference
028781-2026
Value
£3,800,000,000
Location
Greater Manchester, United Kingdom
Published
March 27, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

November 22, 2027

Submission Deadline

November 29, 2027

Contract Start Date

November 29, 2027

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£3,800,000,000
Duration
180 months
Location
Greater Manchester
Type
Restricted Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council is seeking to develop a long-term energy partnership to transform and decarbonise Oldham's energy infrastructure. The Development Partner will originate, define, develop, finance, deliver, and operate decarbonisation projects, including a Heat Network Reference Scheme. The Council has secured grant funding to support this initiative.

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Poland, Lithuania, and Latvia.

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

18 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (8)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Suppliers are solely responsible for ensuring they access and download all procurement documentation at every stage.
--Bidders must ensure any proposed Key SC-P-CM or similar is not proposed in any other bidding Supplier's response.
--Redacted versions of ITT documents are published, with unredacted versions of Appendices B and C to be published within three weeks.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Must be a single entity or form a Special Purpose Vehicle if a consortium.
--Key Sub-Contractors, Partners, Consortium Members (SC-P-CM) or similar can only be proposed for one bidding Supplier.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS8
--Proven expertise, experience, capacity, and capabilities to innovate and generate holistic and deliverable energy solutions.
--Ability to leverage unique apex position within Oldham's energy system to develop and implement an innovative business model.
--Ability to exploit technological and commercial synergies between different low carbon Asset Classes.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided text, beyond the estimated contract value.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.

Login
75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the Oldham Green New Deal Partnership presents a comprehensive opportunity for energy decarbonisation, with a substantial estimated value and a clear vision for a long-term partnership. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and detailed financial requirements for bidders.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear procedure and CPV code. The submission deadline, while long, is not flagged as unreasonable in the context of the project's complexity. No disputes are indicated. The procedure is competitive, suggesting a regulated process.

Clarity80/100

The description of the project is detailed, outlining the scope of work, expected collaboration, and the strategic importance of the heat network. Key requirements for technical capability are well-documented. However, specific evaluation criteria are missing, which could impact bidder understanding.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. The contract start date aligns with the submission deadline. However, the content of the tender documents is not readily available, and specific financial requirements for bidders are not detailed.

No document content available
No specific financial requirements detailed for bidders
Fairness85/100

The tender is a restricted procedure, which can limit competition. However, the description of the project and the broad scope of work suggest an objective approach to selecting a partner. The value is disclosed, and the use of e-procurement is implied by the reference to submission instructions. The requirement for key subcontractors to be proposed for only one bidder promotes fair competition among consortia.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. Financing information is partially addressed through the mention of the GHNF grant. However, the lack of explicit mention of e-submission and the URL for documents makes the submission process less practical. The availability of document content is also a concern.

No e-submission mentioned
No document URL provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. The contract start date aligns with the submission deadline, indicating logical date sequencing. No suspensions or disputes are reported.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is strongly focused on decarbonisation and green energy initiatives, aligning with green procurement principles. However, explicit mention of social aspects, innovation as a specific evaluation criterion, or EU funding confirmation is absent, limiting its score in this category.

No explicit mention of social aspects
No explicit mention of innovation as a criterion

Strengths

Comprehensive project description and vision
Substantial estimated value and long-term partnership potential
Clear technical capability requirements
Logical date sequencing and data consistency

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of readily available tender document content
Absence of specific financial requirements for bidders
Potential limitations of a restricted procedure

Recommendations

1. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria.
2. Ensure all tender documents are accessible with clear URLs.
3. Provide specific financial requirements or guidance for potential bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline