Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Supply of informational and representation materials

Open
Deadline
9 days left
April 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
169269
Value
€41,999
Location
Latvia
Published
March 26, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
lowest pricePrice
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 13, 2026

Tender Opening

April 13, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€41,999
Duration
24 months
Location
Latvia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€31,439
Avg. Bids
2.4
Competition
Low
SME Winners
100%
4,396 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Supply of informational and representation materials

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for informational and representation materials requires a focus on cost-effectiveness and demonstrated capability. Bidders should leverage their experience and highlight efficient production processes to win, particularly in parts evaluated solely on price. While social value and innovation are not explicitly required, demonstrating a commitment to quality and reliability will be crucial.

Key Winning Messages

Cost-effective quality: Delivering high-quality informational and representation materials at the most competitive prices.

Proven reliability: Demonstrating a track record of successful project delivery and client satisfaction.

Efficient production: Highlighting streamlined processes for timely and cost-efficient fulfillment.

Key Opportunities
Exploiting price-driven evaluation criteria in specific parts of the tender.
Leveraging existing client references to build credibility.
Demonstrating efficient operational capabilities to justify competitive pricing.
Key Challenges
Lack of specified financial requirements may lead to uncertainty in competitor financial strength.

Focus on demonstrating strong operational efficiency and competitive pricing to offset potential financial disparities. Ensure all mandatory requirements are met meticulously.

The absence of explicit evaluation criteria for most parts necessitates a strong focus on meeting all mandatory requirements and offering competitive pricing where applicable.

Thoroughly review the requirements for each part and tailor proposals to meet or exceed them. Prioritize cost-competitiveness for parts evaluated solely on price.

Potential for high competition due to the relatively low estimated value and broad scope of 'informational and representation materials'.

Clearly articulate unique selling propositions related to efficiency, quality, or specific product expertise. Ensure the bid is meticulously prepared and error-free.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A small to medium-sized enterprise (SME) with proven experience in producing promotional merchandise and printed materials, possessing efficient in-house production capabilities or strong, established supplier relationships. The ideal bidder will have a track record of delivering quality products on time and at competitive prices, with a clear understanding of the Latvian market and regulatory environment.
Key Requirements
Description of experience and client references
Declaration of independent tender development
Technical and financial proposals for each part
Compliance with exclusion grounds (anti-competitive communication, Russian involvement)
Declaration of persons/subcontractors' capabilities
Subcontractor list (if applicable for services >= 10,000 EUR)
Key Discriminators
Demonstrable cost savings through optimized production processes or bulk purchasing power.
Exceptional client testimonials specifically for similar types of materials and delivery timelines.
A clear and concise presentation of technical proposals that directly address the stated requirements for each part.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider a subtle mention of ethical sourcing of materials or local employment if it aligns with the bidder's existing practices, framing it as a commitment to responsible business operations.
Bid Focus Areas
Lowest Price (for specific parts)100% (for specific parts)

Conduct a thorough cost analysis to identify opportunities for aggressive pricing. Optimize production workflows and material sourcing to achieve the lowest possible cost without compromising essential quality.

Technical CapabilityN/A (implied)

Provide detailed and compelling descriptions of experience, supported by strong client references. Clearly outline the capabilities of key personnel and any subcontractors, ensuring all declarations are complete and accurate.

Recommendations6
Meticulously Document Experience and References
CriticalMed effort

Ensure the description of experience is detailed, relevant, and directly addresses the types of materials specified. Provide strong, verifiable client references that attest to quality, timeliness, and reliability.

Directly addresses a core eligibility and technical capability requirement, building trust and credibility.
Aggressively Price Price-Driven Parts
CriticalHigh effort

For parts explicitly evaluated on the lowest price, conduct a rigorous cost-benefit analysis to offer the most competitive bid possible. Explore all avenues for cost reduction in production, materials, and logistics.

Maximizes scoring potential for parts where price is the sole determinant, significantly increasing win probability.
Highlight Production Efficiency and Turnaround Times
HighMed effort

Emphasize streamlined production processes, in-house capabilities, or strong supplier relationships that ensure efficient delivery and quick turnaround times. This can be a subtle differentiator even when price is key.

Positions the bidder as a reliable and efficient partner, potentially justifying slightly higher prices if quality and speed are superior.
Ensure Full Compliance with Exclusion Grounds
HighLow effort

Conduct internal checks to confirm no anti-competitive communication has occurred and that there are no prohibited Russian involvements. Prepare all necessary declarations to this effect.

Prevents immediate disqualification, which is a critical prerequisite for any bid.
Submit a Flawless Application and Declarations
CriticalMed effort

Pay extreme attention to detail in completing the application form and all required declarations, especially the declaration of independent tender development. Errors or omissions here can lead to disqualification.

Ensures the bid progresses to the evaluation stage.
Clarify Ambiguities in Tender Documents
MediumLow effort

If any requirements or evaluation criteria remain unclear after initial review, proactively seek clarification from the contracting authority through the designated channels before the submission deadline.

Reduces the risk of misinterpretation and ensures the bid accurately addresses the authority's needs.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most cost-effective provider for standard items while highlighting superior quality and reliability for more complex materials. Emphasize efficiency and speed of delivery as key advantages.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

13 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (1)
Technical (4)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must submit an application form for participation in the tender.
--Bidders must submit a declaration confirming that their tender has been independently developed.
--If engaging subcontractors for services valued at least 10,000 euros, a subcontractor list must be provided.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Bidders must not have engaged in anti-competitive communication with other bidders.
--Bidders must comply with relevant regulations, including restrictions on Russian involvement.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must confirm their compliance with tender conditions and relevant regulations.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must provide a description of their experience.
--Bidders must provide supporting documents like client references to verify their experience.
--Bidders must list persons whose capabilities they rely on to prove their qualifications.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Not specified.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

16 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
169269_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260326122358.pdf -- 93.9 KB

This document outlines the technical and financial requirements for the first part of a tender for the supply of stationery by Rīgas Valsts tehnikums.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 2.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
169269_PD.ANY_1_1_2_20260326122358.pdf -- 93.9 KB

This document outlines the technical and financial requirements, exclusion conditions, and selection criteria for the second part (Electronics) of a tender for informational and presentation materials by Rīgas Valsts tehnikums.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 3.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
169269_PD.ANY_1_1_3_20260326122358.pdf -- 94.2 KB

This document outlines the specific requirements for the third part (accessories) of a tender for informational and promotional materials by Rīgas Valsts tehnikums, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 4.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
169269_PD.ANY_1_1_4_20260326122358.pdf -- 93.9 KB

This document outlines the technical and financial requirements for the fourth part of a tender concerning paper bags, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, and evaluation methods.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 5.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
169269_PD.ANY_1_1_5_20260326122358.pdf -- 94.3 KB

This document outlines the tender requirements for Part 5 (Water bottles, mugs) of a procurement by Rīgas Valsts tehnikums, specifying exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria based solely on the lowest price.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 6.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
169269_PD.ANY_1_1_6_20260326122359.pdf -- 93.9 KB

This document outlines the tender requirements for lot 6 (leather goods) of the Rīgas Valsts tehnikums procurement, detailing exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria based solely on the lowest price.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 7.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
169269_PD.ANY_1_1_7_20260326122359.pdf -- 94.1 KB

This document outlines the specific requirements for tender part No. 7 (Textiles) for the supply of informational and representative materials by Rīgas Valsts tehnikums, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.

2.pielikums - Pieteikums dalībai iepirkumāDOC
2_pielikums_Pieteikums.docx -- 36.7 KB

This document is an application form for participation in a tender, requiring bidders to confirm their compliance with tender conditions and relevant regulations, including restrictions on Russian involvement.

3.pielikums - Apliecinājums par neatkarīgi izstrādātu piedāvājumuDOC
3_pielikums_Apliecinājums.docx -- 32.9 KB

This document is a bidder's declaration confirming that their tender for the supply of informational and representation materials has been independently developed and that they have not engaged in any anti-competitive communication with other bidders.

4.pielikums - Pretendenta pieredzes aprakstsDOC
4_pielikums_Pretendenta pieredzes apraksts.do... -- 31.3 KB

This document is a bidder's experience description form, requiring supporting documents like client references to verify the provided experience for the "Supply of informational and representation materials" tender.

5.pielikums - Personu, uz kuru iespējām pretendents balstās sarakstsDOC
5_pielikums_Personas uz kuru iespējām balstās... -- 36.2 KB

This document is a list of persons whose capabilities the bidder relies on to prove their qualifications for the procurement of information and representation materials.

6.pielikums - Apakšuzņēmēju sarakstsDOC
6_pielikums_Apakšuzņēmēju saraksts.docx -- 33.7 KB

This document is a subcontractor list to be filled by bidders if they plan to engage subcontractors for services valued at least 10,000 euros.

7.pielikums - Personu apliecinājumsDOC
7_pielikums_Apliecinājums.docx -- 29.5 KB

This document is a declaration by a person or subcontractor whose capabilities are relied upon by the bidder, confirming their involvement in providing services or resources for the "Supply of Information and Representation Materials" tender.

8.pielikums - Iepirkuma līgumsDOC
8_pielikums_Liguma projekts.doc -- 159.0 KB

This document contains the draft of a procurement contract for the supply of informational materials, outlining the subject matter, contract sum, payment terms, delivery, warranty, responsibilities, and contract amendments.

NolikumsDOC
Nolikums.docx -- 67.7 KB

This document contains the regulations for a tender process by Rīgas Valsts tehnikums for the supply of informational and promotional materials, divided into seven parts.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for a tender procedure for the supply of informational and representation materials by Rīgas Valsts tehnikums.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for informational and representation materials is generally well-structured with clear documentation and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria for most parts and has some concerns regarding document access and e-submission.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear procedure, a proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable given the submission deadline. Regulatory compliance, including restrictions on Russian involvement, is mentioned.

Clarity80/100

The description of the tender is clear, and the requirements are documented across multiple technical specification documents. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria for most parts detracts from overall clarity.

Missing evaluation criteria for most parts
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, contract duration, and deadlines. All necessary documents, including forms and technical specifications for each part, are attached. However, financial requirements are not specified.

Financial requirements not specified
Fairness85/100

The tender is divided into parts, allowing for broader participation. The estimated value is disclosed, and the use of e-procurement is noted. Objective criteria are mentioned for some parts (lowest price), but the lack of explicit criteria for others could be a concern. Document access is flagged as restricted.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as e-procurement, which is positive. However, the 'Issues' section flags 'No e-submission', which is contradictory and needs clarification. The contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, and financing information is absent.

Contradiction regarding e-submission
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. Dates appear logical, with the reveal date preceding the submission and opening dates.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear documentation and forms provided
Tender divided into multiple parts
Estimated value and contract duration specified
CPV code provided

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria for most parts
Restricted document access
Contradiction regarding e-submission
Lack of explicit sustainability criteria

Recommendations

1. Clarify document access and e-submission process.
2. Specify evaluation criteria for all tender parts.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability aspects.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline