Supply and installation of metal furniture

This tender for metal furniture supply and installation is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a defined process. However, the absence of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria slightly impacts completeness and fairness.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and an active status. The procedure is not explicitly defined as a specific type, which is a minor point of ambiguity. No disputes are reported. Deadlines are present but could be considered tight.

The description of the goods to be supplied is clear. The existence of tender documents and a clarification document indicates that requirements are documented. However, specific evaluation criteria are missing, which affects the clarity of how bids will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, CPV code, and deadline. However, the estimated financial value is not disclosed, and the contract duration is not specified, which are significant omissions.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The access to documents is provided. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent, though no specific company tailoring is evident.

The tender is active and has a submission deadline. E-procurement is indicated. However, the lack of explicit mention of e-submission as the sole method and the absence of financing information and contract start date reduce practicality.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The dates are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes. The CPV code is present and relevant.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.