Skip to main content
Tenders

Lincoln College - Window Glazing Replacement - Abbey Building, Friary Building and Temple Building

Open
Deadline
27 days left
April 24, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
023176-2026
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Lincolnshire, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 17, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 24, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 28, 2026

Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
2 months
Location
Lincolnshire
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Salix PSDS Phase 4 - Lincoln College Window Glazing Replacement - Abbey Building, Friary Building and Temple Building

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements listed.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for window glazing replacement at Lincoln College is generally well-structured but lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and financial value, impacting completeness and potentially fairness. The absence of explicit sustainability or innovation requirements limits its score in that category.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender follows an open procedure and specifies a CPV code. Deadlines are provided, and there are no reported disputes. The procedure appears compliant with general procurement regulations, though the absence of a reveal date is a minor issue.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the basic information is present. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to fully understand how their submissions will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Key information such as the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. While basic details and deadlines are present, the lack of financial transparency and detailed requirements affects the overall completeness.

Value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and the procedure is standard. However, the lack of disclosed value and specific evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent. The absence of tailored requirements for specific companies is positive.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and financing details reduces its practicality for potential bidders.

No e-submission
Missing financing info
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates provided are logical.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, which limits its score in this category. It is not indicated as EU funded.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Open procedure with specified CPV code
Active status with reasonable deadline
No reported disputes

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
No explicit sustainability or innovation requirements
No e-submission mentioned

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated contract value for greater transparency.
2. Specify clear evaluation criteria to guide bidders.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability or innovation elements if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline