Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Reconstruction of regional road No. 118 Kupiškis–Utena and Taikos St. intersection into a roundabout

Open
Deadline
4 days left
April 08, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7163437
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Utena County, Lithuania
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 30, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 01, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 08, 2026

Tender Opening

April 08, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
7 months
Location
Utena County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€131,412
Avg. Bids
3.9
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
98%
2,076 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Rationally using allocated funds, determine the winning bid and conclude a service procurement agreement

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender seeks engineering design services for a roundabout intersection. Given the 'lowest price' evaluation, a strategy focused on delivering a technically sound, compliant, and cost-effective solution is paramount. Differentiation will come from demonstrating efficiency and a clear understanding of the contracting authority's needs.

Key Winning Messages

Cost-Effective, Compliant Design Excellence

Efficient Project Delivery for Local Infrastructure Improvement

Key Opportunities
Lowest Price Evaluation
Clear Scope of Work
Defined Project Duration
Key Challenges
Lack of Specified Evaluation Criteria (beyond lowest price)

Focus on meticulous adherence to all mandatory requirements and ensure the technical proposal is clear, concise, and directly addresses the project's engineering needs without unnecessary complexity. Assume a baseline technical quality is expected.

Intense Price Competition

Develop a lean and efficient project execution plan. Optimize resource allocation and minimize overheads to present the most competitive price while ensuring quality.

Potential for Ambiguity in 'Pre-Project Proposals'

Request clarification from the contracting authority regarding the expected level of detail and deliverables for 'pre-project proposals' early in the process. Ensure the technical proposal clearly outlines the methodology and expected outputs.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A small to medium-sized engineering consultancy with proven experience in road infrastructure design, particularly in Lithuania. They should possess a lean operational structure to offer competitive pricing while maintaining high technical quality and efficient project delivery.
Key Requirements
Mandatory Exclusion Grounds Compliance
Eligibility Requirements Fulfillment
Technical Capability for Engineering Design
Financial Soundness
Complete Tender File Submission
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated efficiency in delivering similar road intersection design projects within tight timelines and budgets.
A clear, concise, and well-structured technical proposal that directly addresses the project's needs with minimal ambiguity.
A highly competitive price that reflects a realistic and efficient approach to project delivery.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider a commitment to local employment or training opportunities during the project execution phase as a subtle differentiator, if feasible within the cost structure.
Bid Focus Areas
PriceN/A (assumed highest)

Achieve the lowest possible compliant price through efficient resource planning and cost control. Conduct thorough cost analysis to identify areas for optimization without compromising quality.

Technical ComplianceN/A (assumed baseline)

Ensure all technical requirements are met precisely. Present a clear, logical, and well-documented technical approach that demonstrates understanding of the project scope and efficient design methodology.

Recommendations6
Thoroughly Vet Exclusion Grounds and Eligibility
CriticalMed effort

Conduct an exhaustive review of all mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements. Ensure all documentation is complete, accurate, and submitted on time to avoid immediate disqualification.

Prevents bid rejection.
Optimize for Lowest Price
CriticalHigh effort

Develop a detailed cost breakdown and identify all potential cost-saving measures in project execution. Focus on lean operations and efficient resource allocation to present a highly competitive price.

Maximizes chances of winning under a lowest price evaluation.
Clarify 'Pre-Project Proposals'
HighLow effort

Proactively seek clarification from the contracting authority on the expected scope, deliverables, and level of detail for 'pre-project proposals' to ensure the technical submission aligns with their expectations.

Ensures technical proposal meets expectations and avoids rework.
Highlight Project Efficiency and Speed
MediumMed effort

Emphasize the bidder's ability to deliver the 7-month project efficiently, showcasing past projects with similar timelines and demonstrating a streamlined project management approach.

Positions the bidder as a reliable and fast executor.
Comprehensive Document Review
HighMed effort

Perform a meticulous review of all tender documents, including the 'Tender Structure XML', 'Pirkimo dokumentai', 'Notice', and 'Sutarties projektas', to identify any potential ambiguities or conflicting requirements.

Reduces risk of errors and misunderstandings.
Consider Local Impact Commitment
LowLow effort

If feasible within the cost structure, include a brief statement about potential local employment or training benefits that could arise from the project's execution, even if not explicitly requested.

Subtle positive impression, potential minor differentiator.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution that meets all technical and legal requirements. Emphasize efficiency and a clear understanding of the project's needs to stand out against potentially less focused competitors.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Basic Requirements

  • Company registration in EU required
  • Proven track record in similar projects
  • Financial stability documentation

Documents

Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.

Login
75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for engineering design services is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable process, though it lacks specific evaluation criteria and sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and an open procedure. Deadlines are provided, and no disputes are indicated. The absence of a specified reveal date for submissions is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The tender provides a clear description of the project and lists mandatory requirements such as exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, and financial capabilities. The attached documents offer further detail on the terms and conditions.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, reference, organization, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which impacts the overall completeness of the financial information.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting accessibility. Objective criteria are implied through the listed requirements, and full document access is provided. No specific company tailoring is apparent.

Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the lack of explicit mention of e-submission and the absence of financing information reduce its practicality. The contract start date is also not specified.

No explicit e-submission mentioned
Financing information not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The tender status is active, and no disputes are reported, indicating good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear project description and title
E-procurement utilized
Comprehensive set of required documents provided
Active status with no reported disputes

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing specific evaluation criteria
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Specify the evaluation criteria for bid assessment.
3. Incorporate sustainability aspects into the tender requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline