Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

(53726) Radio communication system maintenance services

Open
Deadline
3 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
7160917
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Klaipeda County, Lithuania
Published
March 27, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 30, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Tender Opening

April 07, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
37 months
Location
Klaipeda County
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€84,482
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
99%
11,281 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

(53726) Radio communication system maintenance services
Green Procurement

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for radio communication system maintenance services requires a strong focus on technical expertise and reliability. Given the 'negotiations with prior invitation' procurement type and unspecified evaluation criteria, a proactive engagement strategy and a clear demonstration of value beyond basic compliance will be crucial for success.

Key Winning Messages

Unwavering Reliability and Technical Excellence in Radio Communication System Maintenance.

Proactive Partnership for Optimized System Performance and Longevity.

Commitment to Sustainable Operations and Green Procurement.

Key Opportunities
Early engagement in the negotiation phase to understand the Contracting Authority's specific needs and priorities.
Leveraging the 'Green Procurement' requirement to differentiate through sustainable maintenance practices and resource efficiency.
Developing a highly responsive and proactive maintenance plan that minimizes downtime and ensures optimal system performance.
Key Challenges
Unspecified Evaluation Criteria: The absence of defined evaluation criteria makes it difficult to tailor the bid precisely for maximum scoring.

Proactively seek clarification during the negotiation phase. Focus on demonstrating superior technical capability, reliability, and value for money, assuming these will be key implicit factors.

Potential for high competition due to the nature of public procurement and the essential service provided.

Focus on clear differentiation through technical expertise, a proactive service model, and strong green procurement commitments. Ensure all mandatory requirements are met flawlessly.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A technically proficient and experienced provider of radio communication system maintenance, with a proven track record of reliability, adherence to quality standards, and a demonstrated commitment to green procurement principles. The ideal bidder will have robust operational capabilities and a clear understanding of the contracting authority's needs.
Key Requirements
Mandatory Exclusion Grounds
Eligibility Requirements
Technical Capability Requirements
Financial Requirements
Submission Requirements
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated experience with similar radio communication systems and a deep understanding of the specific technologies used by AB KN Energies.
A proactive maintenance strategy that goes beyond reactive repairs, focusing on preventative measures and system optimization.
Quantifiable commitments to green procurement, such as waste reduction in maintenance, energy-efficient practices, and use of eco-friendly materials.
A highly responsive and flexible service delivery model, ensuring minimal disruption to operations.
Social Value Opportunities
While 'Social Aspects: No' is stated, consider incorporating a commitment to local employment or skills development within the maintenance team if feasible and not contradictory to other requirements. This could be framed as enhancing local capacity for critical infrastructure maintenance.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Capability

Provide detailed evidence of past performance, certifications, and specialized expertise in radio communication system maintenance. Highlight the qualifications and experience of key personnel. Demonstrate a robust methodology for fault diagnosis, repair, and preventative maintenance.

Reliability and Service Delivery

Outline a clear service level agreement (SLA) with guaranteed response times and resolution rates. Present a comprehensive risk management plan for service disruptions. Emphasize a proactive approach to maintenance.

Green Procurement

Detail specific initiatives for waste reduction, energy efficiency in operations, and responsible disposal of materials. Align with any known sustainability goals of AB KN Energies.

Cost-Effectiveness

While not explicitly stated as a criterion, present a competitive and transparent pricing structure. Highlight the long-term value and cost savings derived from proactive maintenance and system longevity.

Recommendations6
Thoroughly Address All Mandatory Exclusion and Eligibility Grounds
CriticalHigh effort

Scrutinize 'SPS 2 priedas. Pašalinimo pagrindai ir kvalifikacijos reikalavimai.pdf' and all other tender documents for any mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements. Ensure all documentation is complete, accurate, and submitted in the correct format to avoid immediate disqualification.

Ensures the bid proceeds to the evaluation stage.
Proactively Seek Clarification on Evaluation Criteria
CriticalMed effort

Given the unspecified evaluation criteria, actively engage with AB KN Energies during the negotiation phase to understand their priorities. Frame questions around technical merit, reliability, value for money, and sustainability.

Allows for precise tailoring of the bid to maximize scoring potential.
Showcase Proactive Maintenance and System Optimization Expertise
HighMed effort

Go beyond standard maintenance. Detail a proactive strategy that includes predictive maintenance, system health monitoring, and recommendations for upgrades or optimizations to enhance performance and lifespan. This demonstrates added value.

Sets the bid apart from competitors offering only reactive services.
Integrate Quantifiable Green Procurement Commitments
MediumMed effort

Develop specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) commitments for green procurement. Examples include reducing waste by X%, using Y% recycled materials, or implementing energy-saving practices during site visits.

Addresses the 'Green Procurement: Yes' requirement and provides a competitive edge.
Develop a Robust Technical Capability Submission
HighHigh effort

Provide detailed case studies, testimonials, and technical specifications of past projects. Highlight the qualifications, certifications, and experience of the proposed maintenance team. Clearly map capabilities to the CPV code and expected service needs.

Demonstrates the ability to meet and exceed technical requirements.
Prepare for Negotiation Phase
HighMed effort

Anticipate potential negotiation points, such as pricing, service levels, and specific technical requirements. Have a clear negotiation strategy and fallback positions ready.

Increases the likelihood of securing favorable contract terms.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most reliable and technically advanced provider, emphasizing a proactive, partnership-based approach to system maintenance rather than a transactional one. Highlight a strong commitment to sustainability that aligns with AB KN Energies' green procurement goals.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Basic Requirements

  • Company registration in EU required
  • Proven track record in similar projects
  • Financial stability documentation

Documents

Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.

Login
75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for radio communication system maintenance services is generally well-structured, with most essential information provided. However, the absence of disclosed estimated value and specific evaluation criteria slightly impacts completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including a clear CPV code and a defined contract duration. The procedure type (negotiations with prior invitation and/or tender with negotiations) is specified. No immediate legal compliance issues are apparent, though the short submission deadline could be a concern in some jurisdictions.

Clarity80/100

The title and CPV code clearly define the subject of the procurement. While the AI-extracted requirements list general categories, the detailed content of the 18 documents would be necessary for a full assessment of clarity. The description is concise.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, reference number, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for potential bidders. The AI-extracted requirements are broad categories, and the actual content of the documents needs to be reviewed for full completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The requirements are listed as general categories (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission), suggesting an objective approach. There are no immediately apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. The lack of disclosed value is a minor concern for fairness.

Practicality65/100

The tender is active and uses e-procurement. However, the AI analysis indicates 'No e-submission' which contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic, creating ambiguity. The contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent. The short submission deadline also impacts practicality.

Ambiguity regarding e-submission capability
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The status is 'active', and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of a tender.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. The tender is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and CPV code
Active status with a defined deadline
E-procurement utilized
Comprehensive set of attached documents

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing specific evaluation criteria
Short submission deadline
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Specify the evaluation criteria for submitted bids.
3. Consider extending the submission deadline to allow for more thorough preparation.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline