Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Renovation works of the neighborhood territory S. Konarskio g. 4A, 4B (tender announced)

Open
Deadline
4 days left
April 08, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7160429
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 30, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 01, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 08, 2026

Tender Opening

April 08, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
12 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€6,132,447
Avg. Bids
4.1
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
90%
960 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Renovation works of the neighborhood territory S. Konarskio g. 4A, 4B
Green Procurement

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

60%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for environmental improvement works in Vilnius presents a moderate competition opportunity. A winning strategy will focus on demonstrating strong technical capability, a clear understanding of green procurement principles, and a commitment to delivering high-quality, sustainable results within the specified timeframe. Proactive engagement with the contracting authority and a well-structured, compliant bid are crucial.

Key Winning Messages

Delivering sustainable urban regeneration through expert environmental improvement works.

A commitment to quality, efficiency, and green principles for the S. Konarskio g. 4A, 4B neighborhood.

Key Opportunities
Leveraging Green Procurement requirements to differentiate.
Demonstrating strong project management for a 12-month delivery.
Capitalizing on the lack of specified evaluation criteria to establish a strong narrative around value and quality.
Proactive engagement with the Contracting Authority to clarify any ambiguities and demonstrate commitment.
Key Challenges
Lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to optimize bid strategy.

Assume a balanced approach prioritizing technical capability, price (if implicitly considered), and green procurement compliance. Focus on clearly articulating the value proposition and demonstrating a thorough understanding of the project's objectives.

Absence of detailed technical, financial, and eligibility requirements necessitates a comprehensive and robust proposal.

Proactively include detailed information on company experience, relevant project examples, financial stability, and a highly competent project team. Err on the side of providing more detail than less.

Potential for a competitive field given the open tender type and urban regeneration focus.

Focus on clear differentiation through superior technical solutions, innovative (even if not explicitly requested) sustainable practices, and a compelling narrative of successful past performance in similar environments.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An experienced construction or environmental works contractor with a proven track record in urban regeneration projects, particularly those involving landscaping, public space improvement, and adherence to green procurement standards. The ideal bidder will have strong project management capabilities, a skilled workforce, and a robust supply chain for sustainable materials.
Key Requirements
Environmental improvement works (CPV: 45262640)
Completion within 12 months duration
Adherence to Green Procurement principles
Submission of a complete tender file
Compliance with Mandatory Exclusion Grounds
Key Discriminators
Demonstrable experience in implementing green procurement principles in urban regeneration projects.
Innovative approaches to sustainable material sourcing and waste reduction.
A highly experienced and dedicated project team with specific expertise in environmental improvement works.
A clear and compelling project execution plan that emphasizes efficiency, quality, and minimal disruption.
Social Value Opportunities
Commitment to employing local labor for a portion of the workforce, contributing to the local economy.
Implementation of waste reduction and recycling programs during the project lifecycle, exceeding minimum requirements.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Capability & Approach

Provide a detailed, step-by-step methodology for executing the environmental improvement works. Highlight the use of sustainable materials and techniques, and demonstrate a deep understanding of the specific site context. Include case studies of similar successful projects.

Green Procurement Compliance

Clearly outline how the bid will meet and exceed green procurement requirements. Detail specific sustainable practices, material choices, and waste management strategies. Quantify environmental benefits where possible.

Project Management & Timeline Adherence

Present a robust project management plan with clear milestones, risk assessments, and contingency plans. Emphasize the ability to deliver within the 12-month timeframe, showcasing efficient resource allocation and scheduling.

Price/Value Proposition

While not specified, ensure the pricing is competitive and reflects the value delivered. Justify costs by highlighting the quality of work, long-term sustainability benefits, and efficient project execution.

Recommendations7
Thoroughly Address Green Procurement
CriticalHigh effort

Given the explicit mention of 'GREEN PROCUREMENT: Yes', dedicate a significant section of the bid to detailing how the project will meet and exceed these requirements. This includes material selection, waste management, energy efficiency, and biodiversity considerations.

High - directly addresses a stated tender requirement and offers a key differentiator.
Develop a Comprehensive Technical Proposal
CriticalHigh effort

Since evaluation criteria are not specified, assume technical merit and a clear understanding of the scope will be paramount. Provide a detailed work plan, methodology, and demonstrate expertise in environmental improvement works. Include visual aids if appropriate.

High - compensates for lack of specified criteria by showcasing capability.
Highlight Project Management Excellence
HighMed effort

Emphasize a strong project management framework, including risk mitigation, quality assurance, and a clear plan for meeting the 12-month deadline. This demonstrates reliability and competence.

Medium - builds confidence in delivery.
Proactive Clarification with Contracting Authority
HighLow effort

If any aspect of the tender is unclear, especially regarding the lack of detailed requirements, submit formal clarification questions to 'Viešoji Įstaiga "Atnaujinkime Miestą"'. This shows engagement and ensures a compliant bid.

High - prevents misinterpretation and ensures a compliant submission.
Incorporate Local Employment Commitments
MediumLow effort

While 'SOCIAL ASPECTS: No' is stated, voluntarily including a commitment to local employment can enhance the bid's broader appeal and demonstrate community engagement, potentially influencing subjective evaluation if price is not the sole driver.

Medium - adds value beyond explicit requirements.
Prepare for Unspecified Requirements
HighHigh effort

Given the lack of detailed requirements, ensure all mandatory elements (exclusion grounds, submission format) are meticulously addressed. Prepare a robust proposal that anticipates potential implicit requirements for technical, financial, and eligibility criteria.

Critical - avoids disqualification due to missing information.
Showcase Relevant Experience with Case Studies
MediumMed effort

Provide detailed case studies of past projects that are similar in scope and complexity to the S. Konarskio g. 4A, 4B neighborhood renovation. Focus on outcomes, challenges overcome, and client satisfaction.

Medium - builds credibility and demonstrates capability.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most sustainable and environmentally responsible solution, leveraging the 'GREEN PROCUREMENT: Yes' requirement. Emphasize long-term value and minimal environmental impact.
Highlight a proactive and transparent approach to project management, assuring the contracting authority of a smooth and efficient delivery within the 12-month timeframe.
If competitors are likely to focus solely on price, differentiate by showcasing superior quality, innovative sustainable practices, and a more comprehensive understanding of urban regeneration principles.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Basic Requirements

  • Company registration in EU required
  • Proven track record in similar projects
  • Financial stability documentation

Documents

Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.

Login
75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for neighborhood area renovation is generally well-structured but lacks crucial details regarding evaluation criteria and financial specifics, impacting completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a clear procedure and proper CPV code. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline might be considered short given the complexity of tender preparation. No disputes are noted.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the tender structure document outlines the need for a complete file. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria creates ambiguity for bidders.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, reference, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and detailed requirements for exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial capabilities are missing, leaving significant gaps.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing detailed requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial)
Fairness85/100

The tender is open and uses e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The lack of disclosed value and specific, objective evaluation criteria could be perceived as less fair, although no explicit tailoring to specific companies is evident.

Estimated value not disclosed
Practicality65/100

The tender is active and uses e-procurement. However, the absence of a direct URL for document access and the lack of explicit financing information or contract start date reduce its practicality.

No direct URL for document access
Financing information not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating good internal consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and CPV code specified
Documents are available and analyzed
Uses e-procurement

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of detailed eligibility and capability requirements
Short submission deadline

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated contract value.
2. Specify clear and objective evaluation criteria.
3. Provide detailed requirements for bidder eligibility and capabilities.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline