Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Information Security Officer (CISO) Services (Tender announced)

Open
Deadline
2 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
PD
Value
€50,000
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 29, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Tender Opening

April 07, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€50,000
Duration
37 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€694,267
Avg. Bids
2.6
Competition
Low
SME Winners
89%
942 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The contracting authority intends to procure Information Security Officer (CISO) services
Green Procurement

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender seeks CISO services for Vilniaus miesto būstas. A winning strategy will focus on demonstrating deep understanding of public sector security needs, leveraging experience with similar entities, and highlighting cost-effectiveness within the estimated budget. Proactive engagement and a clear value proposition are crucial.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable and Cost-Effective CISO Expertise for Public Sector Stability

Proactive Security Posture and Risk Mitigation Tailored to Municipal Needs

Commitment to Sustainable and Responsible Service Delivery

Key Opportunities
Lack of specified evaluation criteria presents an opportunity to define the value proposition strongly.
Green Procurement requirement allows for differentiation through sustainable practices.
The estimated value and duration suggest a need for a stable, long-term solution, favoring experienced providers.
The CPV code (79417000 - Security consultancy services) indicates a need for strategic and advisory CISO functions.
Key Challenges
Absence of detailed evaluation criteria makes it difficult to tailor the bid precisely to the buyer's priorities.

Focus on demonstrating comprehensive understanding of CISO roles in public sector, aligning proposed services with general best practices in information security, and clearly articulating the value proposition in terms of risk reduction, compliance, and operational efficiency. Proactively seek clarification if possible.

Low estimated value for a 37-month contract might indicate a tight budget or a need for a very lean service model.

Develop a highly cost-efficient service delivery model. Clearly demonstrate how the proposed services will provide maximum value within the budget, potentially through phased implementation or leveraging existing client infrastructure where appropriate. Highlight efficiency gains.

Limited information on mandatory/eligibility/technical/financial requirements requires a comprehensive and robust submission.

Assume a high standard for all mandatory requirements. Ensure all documentation is meticulously prepared, clear, and directly addresses the implied needs of a CISO service for a municipal entity. Over-deliver on clarity and completeness.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A specialized cybersecurity consultancy with proven experience in providing CISO-as-a-service to public sector organizations, particularly municipalities or housing associations. The ideal bidder possesses a strong track record in Lithuania, understands local regulatory frameworks, and can offer a cost-effective, scalable solution within the specified budget. They should also demonstrate a commitment to green procurement principles.
Key Requirements
Provision of Information Security Officer (CISO) services
Compliance with Green Procurement principles
Submission of a complete tender according to the specified structure (Document 2)
Adherence to tender conditions (Document 1)
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated experience with Lithuanian public sector entities, specifically municipal or housing associations.
A clear and quantifiable approach to Green Procurement within the CISO service delivery.
A highly cost-effective and scalable service model that clearly aligns with the €50,000 budget over 37 months.
Proactive risk assessment and mitigation strategies tailored to the specific context of 'Vilniaus miesto būstas'.
Social Value Opportunities
Commit to a training program for Vilniaus miesto būstas staff on basic cybersecurity hygiene, enhancing local digital literacy and security awareness.
Bid Focus Areas
Overall Value Proposition (implicitly, due to no specified criteria)

Articulate a compelling narrative that combines cost-effectiveness, robust security expertise, and a commitment to public sector needs. Quantify benefits where possible (e.g., reduction in potential incident costs, improved compliance posture).

Green Procurement ComplianceN/A (but likely important)

Detail specific initiatives for reducing environmental impact in service delivery (e.g., remote work policies, energy-efficient hardware usage if applicable, digital documentation).

Service Delivery Model

Present a lean, efficient, and scalable model that clearly demonstrates how CISO services will be delivered effectively within the budget constraints. Highlight any automation or technology used to optimize service delivery.

Recommendations6
Thoroughly Review and Adhere to All Tender Documents
CriticalHigh effort

Meticulously examine 'Pirkimo dokumentai' (Document 1) and the tender structure (Document 2) to ensure full compliance with all stated conditions, submission formats, and deadlines. Any deviation can lead to disqualification.

Ensures eligibility and avoids immediate rejection.
Develop a Strong, Implicit Value Proposition
CriticalHigh effort

Since evaluation criteria are not specified, focus on building a comprehensive proposal that clearly articulates the bidder's unique value. Emphasize cost-effectiveness, proven experience in public sector security, and a proactive risk management approach tailored to a municipal housing entity.

Maximizes scoring potential by addressing likely buyer priorities.
Highlight Green Procurement Commitment
HighMed effort

Detail specific, actionable steps the bidder will take to meet the 'Green Procurement' requirement. This could include sustainable operational practices, reduced travel, or digital-first approaches to service delivery.

Provides a clear competitive advantage and meets a stated requirement.
Propose a Cost-Effective and Scalable CISO Model
HighHigh effort

Given the €50,000 budget over 37 months, present a service model that is lean, efficient, and can scale with the client's needs. Demonstrate how this model delivers maximum security value within the financial constraints.

Addresses budget concerns and demonstrates financial acumen.
Address Potential Ambiguity in Requirements
MediumMed effort

Where specific requirements are missing (e.g., eligibility, technical), assume a high standard and provide comprehensive information. Consider seeking clarification from the contracting authority if permissible and strategically beneficial.

Reduces risk of missing implicit expectations and strengthens the bid's completeness.
Incorporate Staff Training on Cybersecurity Hygiene
MediumLow effort

Propose a brief training module for Vilniaus miesto būstas staff to improve general cybersecurity awareness. This adds value beyond the core CISO function and demonstrates a commitment to the client's overall security posture.

Enhances client satisfaction and demonstrates added value.
Competitive Positioning
Position as a trusted partner for public sector cybersecurity, emphasizing stability, reliability, and cost-efficiency. Highlight experience with similar Lithuanian entities to build credibility. Focus on proactive risk management and a clear understanding of the unique security challenges faced by municipal organizations.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Basic Requirements

  • Company registration in EU required
  • Proven track record in similar projects
  • Financial stability documentation

Documents

Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.

Login
75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for CISO services is generally well-structured but lacks specific evaluation criteria and detailed requirements, impacting clarity and completeness. The short submission deadline is a concern.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure (2014/24/ES) and uses a proper CPV code. Deadlines are specified, though the submission deadline appears short. No disputes are indicated. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the procedure type.

Submission deadline may be too short
Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the CPV code is appropriate. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed eligibility/technical/financial requirements makes the overall clarity moderate.

No evaluation criteria specified
Missing specific eligibility, technical, and financial requirements
Completeness70/100

Basic information like title, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. Three tender documents are provided. However, the lack of detailed requirements and evaluation criteria means the documentation is not fully complete for a bidder to prepare a comprehensive proposal.

Missing specific requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial)
Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and the value is disclosed. The use of e-procurement is noted. Criteria are not specified, which could be a concern, but there are no explicit requirements tailored to specific companies. Full document access is implied by the provided document links.

No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting e-submission is likely. Contract duration and start date (implied by deadline) are present. Financing information is not explicitly detailed. The short submission deadline impacts practicality.

Submission deadline may be too short
Financing information not explicitly detailed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates appear logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is not indicated as EU funded.

No green procurement considerations
No social criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear title and description
Proper CPV code and open procedure type
Estimated value and contract duration specified
E-Procurement indicated

Concerns

Missing specific requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial)
No evaluation criteria specified
Short submission deadline

Recommendations

1. Specify detailed evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
2. Provide specific requirements for exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial capabilities.
3. Consider extending the submission deadline to allow for adequate preparation.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline