Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Catering services

Open
Deadline
3 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7156238
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
March 27, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Tender Opening

April 07, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
3 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€867,926
Avg. Bids
1.9
Competition
Low
SME Winners
74%
210 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Indicated in the procurement documents
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

55%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for catering services presents an opportunity for experienced providers. Given the lack of specified evaluation criteria and detailed requirements, a winning strategy will focus on demonstrating exceptional value, robust operational capability, and a proactive approach to green procurement, even without explicit mandates.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable, High-Quality Catering with a Sustainable Approach

Operational Excellence and Value for Money

Proactive Partnership for Service Delivery

Key Opportunities
Lack of specified evaluation criteria allows for proactive value propositioning.
The explicit mention of 'Green Procurement' allows for differentiation through sustainability initiatives, even if not heavily weighted.
Short contract duration (3 months) suggests a need for rapid mobilization and efficient service delivery.
Open tender type implies a potentially competitive field, necessitating a strong, clear bid.
Key Challenges
Absence of detailed technical, financial, and submission requirements creates uncertainty and requires assumptions.

Thoroughly review all provided documents (even if AI summary is limited) and make reasonable, well-justified assumptions. Clearly state these assumptions in the bid. Consider requesting clarification if possible, though the deadline is distant.

Unspecified evaluation criteria make it difficult to optimize the bid for scoring.

Focus on demonstrating overall excellence across all potential evaluation areas: quality, price (if applicable), technical capability, and sustainability. Assume a balanced evaluation approach.

Limited information on the Contracting Authority's specific needs and expectations.

Research the 'Viešoji įstaiga Inovacijų agentūra' (Innovation Agency Public Institution) to understand their mission, values, and typical operational needs. Tailor the bid to align with their likely objectives.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An experienced catering service provider with a proven track record in delivering high-quality food services, particularly for public institutions. The ideal bidder will have strong operational efficiency, a commitment to sustainability, and the flexibility to adapt to potentially undefined requirements.
Key Requirements
Mandatory Exclusion Grounds
Eligibility Requirements
Technical Capability Requirements
Financial Requirements
Submission Requirements
Green Procurement
Key Discriminators
Demonstrable commitment to sustainable sourcing and waste reduction beyond minimum requirements.
A highly flexible and responsive service model tailored to the short contract duration.
Evidence of exceptional customer service and client satisfaction in similar public sector contracts.
Social Value Opportunities
Commitment to sourcing a percentage of ingredients from local, sustainable producers within Lithuania.
Implementation of a food waste reduction program with clear targets and reporting mechanisms.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Capability

Provide detailed evidence of operational capacity, experienced staff, and quality control processes. Highlight flexibility and responsiveness.

Green Procurement

Detail specific initiatives for waste reduction, sustainable sourcing, energy efficiency in operations, and responsible disposal. Even if not explicitly weighted, it signals alignment with public sector goals.

Value for Money

While price isn't specified as an evaluation criterion, present a competitive and transparent pricing structure that reflects high quality and efficiency. Avoid being the lowest bidder if it compromises quality or sustainability.

Recommendations7
Thoroughly Review All Tender Documents
CriticalHigh effort

Despite AI summaries, meticulously read all PDFs and DOCX files provided. Pay close attention to any embedded information or implicit requirements within the general terms and conditions.

Ensures full compliance and identification of all explicit and implicit requirements.
Assume Balanced Evaluation and Demonstrate Excellence
CriticalMed effort

Since evaluation criteria are not specified, assume a balanced approach considering quality, technical capability, price, and sustainability. Focus on excelling in all these areas to cover potential scoring mechanisms.

Maximizes chances of scoring well regardless of the actual weighting.
Proactive Sustainability Initiatives
HighMed effort

Go beyond the 'Yes' for Green Procurement. Detail specific, measurable initiatives for waste reduction, sustainable sourcing, and energy efficiency. This demonstrates foresight and commitment.

Sets the bid apart from competitors who may only meet minimum requirements.
Research Contracting Authority
HighMed effort

Investigate the 'Viešoji įstaiga Inovacijų agentūra' to understand their mission, values, and operational context. Tailor the bid to align with their likely strategic objectives.

Ensures the bid resonates with the client's broader goals.
Clearly State Assumptions
CriticalLow effort

Given the lack of detail, clearly articulate any assumptions made regarding service scope, quality standards, or operational parameters within the bid document.

Manages expectations and avoids potential disputes later.
Incorporate Local Sourcing and Waste Reduction
MediumMed effort

Include specific commitments to sourcing from local Lithuanian producers and implementing a robust food waste reduction program. This adds value beyond core service delivery.

Enhances social and environmental credentials, potentially appealing to public sector values.
Develop a Flexible Service Model
HighMed effort

Given the short 3-month duration, emphasize the ability to rapidly mobilize, adapt to changing needs, and provide a highly responsive service.

Addresses the specific constraint of the contract duration effectively.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as a reliable, high-quality, and forward-thinking catering partner that proactively addresses sustainability and operational efficiency, even in the absence of explicit detailed requirements.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--Specified in the procurement documents.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information available on mandatory exclusion grounds.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information available on eligibility requirements.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information available on technical capability requirements.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information available on financial requirements.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

0. Specialiosios pirkimo sąlygos.docxDOC
0. Specialiosios pirkimo sąlygos.docx -- 74.2 KB

No content extracted

2. Technine_specifikacija_VSD_maitinimas.docxDOC
2. Technine_specifikacija_VSD_maitinimas.docx -- 35.9 KB

No content extracted

3. Pašalinimo pagrindai.docxDOC
3. Pašalinimo pagrindai.docx -- 53.4 KB

No content extracted

5. Pasiūlymo forma.docxDOC
5. Pasiūlymo forma.docx -- 223.7 KB

No content extracted

6. Sutarties bendrosios salygos.docxDOC
6. Sutarties bendrosios salygos.docx -- 110.6 KB

No content extracted

6. Sutarties Specialiosios sąlygos.docxDOC
6. Sutarties Specialiosios sąlygos.docx -- 82.1 KB

No content extracted

Atviro konkurso bendrosios salygos.pdfPDF
Atviro konkurso bendrosios salygos.pdf -- 370.3 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_7156238.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for catering services in Vilnius, Lithuania, with submissions required electronically by April 7, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for catering services is generally well-structured with a clear CPV code and EU funding indication. However, it lacks crucial details regarding evaluation criteria and financial value, impacting completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure and indicates EU funding, suggesting regulatory compliance. The CPV code is appropriate. However, the absence of a reveal date for submissions is a minor procedural oversight. Deadlines are generally reasonable for an open procedure.

Missing reveal date for submissions
Clarity80/100

The title and CPV code are clear. The description states that details are in the procurement documents, which is standard. However, the lack of explicit mention of evaluation criteria within the main notice reduces overall clarity for potential bidders.

Evaluation criteria not specified in the main notice
Completeness70/100

Key information such as the title, reference, organization, and CPV code are present. The contract duration is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details like eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are not explicitly stated in the main tender information, relying entirely on attached documents.

Estimated value not disclosed
Eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements not detailed in the main notice
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, which promotes fairness. The use of e-procurement is positive. However, the undisclosed estimated value and the lack of specified objective evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent, potentially impacting fairness if criteria are subjective or not clearly communicated.

Estimated value not disclosed
Evaluation criteria not specified
Practicality65/100

The tender is indicated as e-procurement, which is positive. However, the contract duration of 3 months is very short, which might limit the pool of interested bidders or lead to higher costs for a short-term service. Financing information is not provided.

Very short contract duration (3 months)
Financing information not provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, CPV, and submission deadline are populated. The tender is active and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logically ordered.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'EU Funded' which can sometimes imply adherence to certain standards, but there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information.

No explicit mention of green procurement
No explicit mention of social aspects

Strengths

Clear CPV code (55320000)
Indication of EU Funding
Open procedure type
E-Procurement enabled

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Evaluation criteria not specified
Very short contract duration (3 months)
Eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements not detailed in the main notice

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated contract value to enhance transparency and fairness.
2. Clearly outline the evaluation criteria within the tender notice or accessible documents.
3. Consider extending the contract duration if feasible to attract a wider range of bidders and ensure service continuity.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline