Development of drinking water supply and wastewater management infrastructure in Kupiškis district

This tender for water and wastewater infrastructure development in Kupiškis district is generally well-structured, with a clear CPV code and EU funding indicated. However, it suffers from a lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria, impacting completeness and clarity.

The tender adheres to general procurement principles with a clear CPV code and EU funding. The procedure is open. However, the absence of a specified reveal date for submissions and the lack of explicit evaluation criteria could be seen as minor procedural gaps.

The tender title and description are clear, and the CPV code is specified. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria and detailed requirements within the provided AI-extracted sections makes it difficult for bidders to fully understand the assessment process.

Key information such as the title, reference, organization, and CPV code are present. The contract duration is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial sections like eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are marked as 'No information provided', significantly impacting completeness.

The tender is an open procedure and uses e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The division into parts is also a positive aspect. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value and the absence of specified evaluation criteria could potentially lead to subjective assessments, although no specific company tailoring is evident.

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting electronic submission. The contract duration is provided. However, the absence of a contract start date and financing information, along with the lack of explicit e-submission details, reduces its practicality.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, CPV, and contract duration are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (submission and opening) are logical. The 'active' status is consistent.

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information, limiting its sustainability score.