Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Endovision operating system (No. 11221-1)

Open
Deadline
30 days left
May 04, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7153713
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

May 04, 2026

Tender Opening

May 04, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
4 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€50,148
Avg. Bids
7.2
Competition
High
SME Winners
99%
54,649 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Endovision operating system (1 set of equipment)
Green Procurement

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for an Endovision Operating System presents a significant opportunity for bidders with a strong focus on cost-effectiveness and demonstrable quality. The overwhelming weight on price (90%) necessitates a highly competitive pricing strategy, while the 10% quality weighting demands a clear articulation of product superiority and support. Leveraging green procurement aspects and demonstrating robust technical capabilities will be crucial for differentiation.

Key Winning Messages

The most cost-effective and technically superior Endovision Operating System, delivered with exceptional support and a commitment to sustainability.

Key Opportunities
Dominant price weighting (90%) allows for significant competitive advantage through aggressive pricing.
Green Procurement requirement offers a platform for differentiation beyond price and basic quality.
The ESPD process is standardized, allowing for efficient and accurate submission if well-prepared.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to 90% weighting.

Conduct thorough cost analysis to identify all potential cost savings. Explore volume discounts or extended payment terms with suppliers. Focus on lean operational processes to minimize overhead.

Limited scope for quality differentiation (10% weight) requires clear and concise value proposition.

Clearly articulate unique selling points of the system, such as superior imaging, ease of use, or advanced features that directly benefit surgical outcomes. Provide strong evidence of reliability and manufacturer support.

Potential for many bidders due to the open procurement type and the nature of the equipment.

Thoroughly research potential competitors and their typical bidding strategies. Focus on building a compelling narrative that highlights both price and quality advantages.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An established medical device supplier with a proven track record in providing endoscopic surgical systems, possessing a highly competitive cost structure, a strong service and support network, and a commitment to sustainable practices. The ideal bidder will have experience with public sector tenders and a deep understanding of the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) requirements.
Key Requirements
European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) completion
Technical capability to supply and support an Endovision Operating System
Competitive pricing (90% evaluation weight)
Demonstrable quality aspects (10% evaluation weight)
Adherence to Green Procurement principles
Key Discriminators
A demonstrably lower total cost of ownership, including maintenance and consumables, beyond the initial purchase price.
A proactive and comprehensive approach to green procurement, detailing specific initiatives and their impact.
Exceptional post-installation support and training, ensuring immediate and effective utilization of the system by the hospital's staff.
Social Value Opportunities
Commitment to sourcing components from suppliers with strong ethical labor practices and a focus on reducing their environmental footprint throughout the supply chain.
Bid Focus Areas
Price90%

Submit the most aggressive and competitive price possible while ensuring profitability. Clearly itemize all costs to demonstrate transparency and value. Consider offering tiered pricing or bundled packages if feasible.

Quality10%

Highlight key technical specifications that exceed minimum requirements, focusing on benefits to surgical procedures and patient outcomes. Provide strong evidence of product reliability, manufacturer reputation, and comprehensive service/support packages. Quantify benefits where possible (e.g., reduced procedure time, improved visualization).

Recommendations6
Aggressive Pricing Strategy
CriticalHigh effort

Given the 90% weighting for price, develop a highly competitive pricing model. Conduct thorough cost-benefit analysis to ensure profitability while offering the lowest possible price. Explore all avenues for cost reduction in the supply chain and operational delivery.

Directly maximizes score in the most heavily weighted evaluation criterion, significantly increasing win probability.
Flawless ESPD Completion
CriticalMed effort

Ensure meticulous and accurate completion of the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD). Any errors or omissions can lead to disqualification. Utilize the provided XML and PDF formats to ensure full compliance.

Ensures the bid is considered and not disqualified on administrative grounds.
Quantifiable Quality Benefits
HighMed effort

For the 10% quality weighting, go beyond generic statements. Quantify the benefits of the proposed system, such as improved diagnostic accuracy, reduced procedure times, enhanced surgeon ergonomics, or lower complication rates. Provide supporting data or case studies.

Maximizes score in the quality criterion and provides a compelling reason to choose the bid beyond price.
Integrate Green Procurement Commitments
MediumMed effort

Proactively detail how the proposed solution and the bidder's operations align with green procurement principles. This could include energy efficiency of the equipment, sustainable packaging, responsible disposal/recycling programs, or low-emission logistics.

Addresses a specific tender requirement and can serve as a differentiator, appealing to the contracting authority's sustainability goals.
Robust Technical Support and Training Plan
MediumMed effort

Outline a comprehensive plan for installation, training, and ongoing technical support. This should include response times, availability of spare parts, and continuous professional development opportunities for hospital staff. This addresses the 'technical capability' requirement and adds value.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to deliver long-term value and operational efficiency, mitigating risks associated with system implementation.
Early Engagement with Contracting Authority (if permissible)
LowLow effort

If the tender rules allow for clarification questions, proactively seek to understand any nuances in the 'quality criteria' or specific expectations for green procurement. This can provide valuable insights for tailoring the bid.

Allows for a more targeted and responsive bid, potentially uncovering unmet needs or specific preferences of the contracting authority.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the optimal balance of aggressive cost-effectiveness and demonstrable, quantifiable quality improvements. Emphasize a long-term partnership approach that prioritizes the hospital's operational efficiency and patient care, underpinned by strong sustainability credentials.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Basic Requirements

  • Company registration in EU required
  • Proven track record in similar projects
  • Financial stability documentation

Documents

Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.

Login
75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for an endoscopic operating system is generally well-structured with clear documentation and a defined process. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and there's a lack of explicit detail on evaluation criteria beyond the price/quality split.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to EU procurement codes and has a clear procedure. CPV code is specified. No disputes are indicated. Deadlines appear reasonable given the opening date is shortly after the submission deadline. The legal form of the organization is stated.

Clarity80/100

The title and description are clear. Technical specifications and quality criteria are referenced in attached documents. The conditions of purchase are also provided. The price/quality split is mentioned, but specific weighting for quality criteria is not detailed.

Missing detailed evaluation criteria beyond the price/quality split.
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and description. Contract duration and tender validity are specified. A significant number of documents are attached, covering technical specifications, quality criteria, contract draft, and procurement conditions. However, the estimated value is missing.

Estimated value is not disclosed.
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and documents are accessible. The use of ESPD suggests a standard eligibility process. The price/quality split is a common evaluation method. No specific company tailoring is apparent. E-procurement is indicated.

Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', implying electronic submission. A contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, but the duration is given. Financing information is not detailed. The contract duration is relatively short (4 months).

Contract start date not explicitly specified.
Financing information not detailed.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates are logically presented, with the opening date following the submission deadline.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation in the provided information. The tender is not indicated as EU funded.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social criteria.

Strengths

Clear documentation and structure
Use of ESPD for eligibility
Price/quality evaluation framework
E-procurement indicated

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Lack of detailed evaluation criteria
Limited sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the procurement.
2. Provide more specific details on the weighting and evaluation of non-price quality criteria.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability or innovation aspects if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline