Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Blood components (open tender)

Open
Deadline
30 days left
May 04, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7151549
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Kaunas County, Lithuania
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

May 04, 2026

Tender Opening

May 04, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
24 months
Location
Kaunas County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€50,148
Avg. Bids
7.2
Competition
High
SME Winners
99%
54,649 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Blood components (open tender)
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for blood components requires a strong focus on compliance, technical capability, and reliable supply chain management. Bidders must demonstrate robust quality control and a deep understanding of the specific needs of a university hospital. Leveraging existing strong relationships and a proven track record in healthcare procurement will be crucial for success.

Key Winning Messages

Unwavering commitment to quality, safety, and regulatory compliance in blood component supply.

Ensuring a secure, reliable, and timely supply chain to support critical patient care at Kauno Klinikos.

Demonstrating value through efficient operations and sustainable practices.

Key Opportunities
Lack of specified evaluation criteria presents an opportunity to shape the perception of value.
Green Procurement requirement allows for differentiation through sustainability initiatives.
The tender is open, suggesting a potential for new entrants but also a need for established players to reaffirm their position.
The duration of 24 months allows for building a long-term partnership, emphasizing reliability and stability.
Key Challenges
Absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to precisely target bid efforts.

Assume a balanced weighting across all mandatory and technical requirements. Focus on exceeding minimum requirements and providing clear, evidence-based responses to all sections. Proactively highlight strengths in areas likely to be implicitly valued, such as quality, reliability, and experience.

Potential for a highly competitive market for blood components, even with an open tender.

Thoroughly research existing suppliers to Kauno Klinikos and their market share. Develop a compelling value proposition that clearly articulates unique selling points beyond price, such as superior quality assurance, innovative logistics, or enhanced customer service.

Ensuring absolute compliance with all mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements.

Conduct a rigorous internal review of all company operations, partnerships, and personnel against the requirements of Council Regulation (EU) 2022/576 and the Public Procurement Law. Prepare all required declarations (Tiekėjo deklaracija dėl (ne)atitikties Reglamento nuostatoms, Deklaracija dėl tiekėjo atsakingų asmenų) with utmost accuracy and supporting documentation.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A well-established supplier of blood components with extensive experience in the healthcare sector, particularly with public hospitals. The ideal bidder possesses a strong quality management system, a reliable and resilient supply chain, and a proven ability to meet stringent regulatory and technical requirements. Experience with Lithuanian public procurement procedures and a commitment to sustainability are advantageous.
Key Requirements
Mandatory Exclusion Grounds (Compliance with EU sanctions)
Eligibility Requirements (General Public Procurement Law)
Technical Capability Requirements (Specific to blood component supply)
Financial Requirements (Stability and capacity)
Submission Requirements (Completeness and accuracy)
Green Procurement (Sustainability considerations)
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated excellence in quality management systems (e.g., ISO certifications relevant to blood products).
Proven track record of reliable and uninterrupted supply to large healthcare institutions.
Innovative approaches to supply chain logistics and inventory management that minimize waste and ensure product integrity.
Proactive engagement with the contracting authority to understand their evolving needs and challenges.
Social Value Opportunities
Commitment to local employment and training opportunities within the supply chain, where feasible and aligned with operational requirements.
Implementing waste reduction strategies in packaging and transportation, contributing to environmental sustainability.
Bid Focus Areas
Mandatory Exclusion Grounds & EligibilityN/A (Pass/Fail)

Ensure 100% compliance. Provide clear, concise, and well-documented declarations. Proactively address any potential ambiguities in the ESPD form (5 priedas).

Technical CapabilityLikely High

Detail robust quality control processes, storage and transportation protocols, and contingency plans for supply disruptions. Provide specific examples of successful past performance in supplying similar products to complex healthcare environments.

Green ProcurementLikely Medium

Outline specific initiatives for reducing environmental impact, such as sustainable packaging, optimized logistics routes, and waste management. Quantify benefits where possible.

Submission RequirementsHigh

Meticulously follow all formatting and content instructions. Ensure all documents are complete, accurate, and submitted by the deadline. Conduct thorough internal reviews before submission.

Recommendations7
Thoroughly Address Exclusion Grounds
CriticalHigh effort

Scrutinize all aspects of the company and its affiliates against Council Regulation (EU) 2022/576. Ensure the 'Tiekėjo deklaracija dėl (ne)atitikties Reglamento nuostatoms' (7 Priedas) is completed with absolute accuracy and supported by internal due diligence.

Failure to comply leads to immediate disqualification.
Proactive Value Proposition Development
CriticalHigh effort

Given the absence of specified evaluation criteria, develop a strong narrative that emphasizes reliability, quality assurance, and supply chain resilience. Frame the bid around how the bidder will be a trusted partner, not just a supplier, to Kauno Klinikos.

Increases perceived value and competitive advantage.
Highlight Quality Management Systems
HighMed effort

Detail the bidder's quality management system (QMS) for blood components, including certifications, internal audits, and continuous improvement processes. This directly addresses the critical nature of the product.

Builds confidence in product safety and efficacy.
Map Responsible Persons Declaration
HighMed effort

Carefully complete the 'Deklaracija dėl tiekėjo atsakingų asmenų' (2 Priedas) if applicable. Ensure all required information is accurate and readily available.

Ensures compliance with Public Procurement Law.
Integrate Green Procurement Commitments
MediumMed effort

Develop specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) commitments for green procurement. Focus on areas like sustainable packaging, reduced carbon footprint in logistics, and waste management.

Enhances bid competitiveness and aligns with public sector sustainability goals.
Develop Robust Supply Chain Contingency Plans
HighMed effort

Outline detailed plans for managing potential disruptions (e.g., supplier issues, transportation delays, unforeseen demand spikes). This demonstrates preparedness and reliability.

Mitigates risk of supply failure and enhances trust.
Thoroughly Complete ESPD Form
HighHigh effort

Pay meticulous attention to detail when completing the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) form (5 priedas). Ensure all sections are filled accurately and consistently with other submitted documentation.

Crucial for eligibility and initial assessment.
Competitive Positioning
Position as a long-term, reliable partner committed to the highest standards of quality and patient safety, rather than just a transactional supplier.
Emphasize a deep understanding of the specific needs of a university hospital environment, including research and specialized treatments.
Highlight any existing positive relationships or successful past engagements with Lithuanian public healthcare institutions.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Basic Requirements

  • EU funding compliance required

Documents

Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.

Login
75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for blood components is generally well-structured with clear documentation and a standard open procedure. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financing, impacting its overall practicality and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to the open procedure (2014/24/ES) and includes a proper CPV code. Deadlines are provided, and the procedure appears to follow regulatory requirements. No disputes are noted. The main concern is the potential shortness of the submission deadline, which could be an issue for bidders.

Submission deadline may be too short
Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear. Key documents like the technical specification, contract draft, and various forms are provided, offering a good understanding of the requirements. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves a gap in understanding how bids will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, reference number, CPV code, and contract duration. A significant number of documents are attached, covering technical specifications, contract drafts, and required forms. The primary missing element is the estimated value of the contract.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender uses an open procedure and e-procurement, promoting fairness. All required documents are accessible, and the use of standard forms like the ESPD is positive. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, suggesting a good level of fairness.

Practicality65/100

The tender is set up for e-procurement, which is a positive for practicality. However, the lack of explicit financing information and the absence of a clear contract start date (beyond the duration) reduce its practicality. The submission deadline, while present, might be perceived as short.

No e-submission details provided
Financing information not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and CPV code are populated correctly. Dates for submission and opening are logical. The contract duration is specified. No suspensions or disputes are indicated, leading to high data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'EU Funded' and 'E-Procurement', which are positive aspects. However, there is no explicit mention of green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation, which are common in modern tenders.

No green procurement criteria mentioned
No social criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear open procedure (2014/24/ES)
Comprehensive set of required documents provided
Use of standard forms like ESPD
E-procurement enabled

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Potential for a short submission deadline
Lack of explicit sustainability criteria

Recommendations

1. Specify the estimated contract value.
2. Clearly outline the evaluation criteria for submitted bids.
3. Consider extending the submission deadline if deemed too short for comprehensive bid preparation.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline