Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Registration of transport and engineering infrastructure of Klaipėda District Municipality (P-2026/14447)

Open
Deadline
30 days left
May 04, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7142107
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Klaipeda County, Lithuania
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

May 04, 2026

Tender Opening

May 04, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
36 months
Location
Klaipeda County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€131,412
Avg. Bids
3.9
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
98%
2,076 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Registration of transport and engineering infrastructure of Klaipėda District Municipality
Green Procurement

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for the registration of transportation and engineering infrastructure in Klaipėda District Municipality presents a moderate competition opportunity. A winning strategy will focus on demonstrating robust technical capability, cost-effectiveness, and a commitment to green procurement principles, even though social value is not explicitly mandated.

Key Winning Messages

Accurate and Efficient Infrastructure Registration for Klaipėda District Municipality.

Leveraging Technology for Sustainable Infrastructure Management.

Cost-Effective and Reliable Service Delivery.

Key Opportunities
Lack of explicitly defined evaluation criteria suggests a strong emphasis on meeting mandatory requirements and potentially a lowest price evaluation.
Green Procurement is a stated requirement, offering a chance to differentiate through sustainable methodologies.
The duration of 36 months allows for building a strong client relationship and demonstrating long-term value.
The absence of specified social value requirements means bidders can focus on technical and environmental aspects without complex social impact reporting.
Key Challenges
The absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to optimize bid scoring.

Assume a 'lowest price' evaluation as indicated in Document 4 and focus on meeting all mandatory requirements flawlessly. Prepare a highly competitive price while ensuring profitability. Also, proactively highlight strengths in technical capability and green procurement to influence perceived value.

Potential for a highly competitive bid due to the open procurement type and the nature of infrastructure services.

Thoroughly research potential competitors and their likely strengths. Develop a clear value proposition that emphasizes efficiency, accuracy, and sustainability to stand out. Ensure the bid is meticulously prepared to avoid any grounds for disqualification.

Unreadable or corrupted tender documents (DOCUMENT 2, DOCUMENT 3) may indicate potential issues with tender clarity or completeness.

Formally request clarification from the contracting authority regarding the missing or corrupted documents. Document all communication. If clarification is not provided, proceed based on the available information, but be prepared to address any ambiguities that arise during the project.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An experienced engineering consultancy or a consortium with a proven track record in infrastructure asset management, GIS, and data registration services. The ideal bidder will possess strong local knowledge of Klaipėda's infrastructure, a highly skilled team of surveyors and engineers, and a demonstrated commitment to sustainable practices.
Key Requirements
Eligibility and Mandatory Exclusion Grounds Compliance
Technical Capability in Infrastructure Registration and Data Management
Financial Stability
Adherence to Green Procurement Principles
Accurate and Comprehensive Submission
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated use of advanced GIS and data management technologies for infrastructure registration.
A clear and actionable plan for implementing green procurement principles throughout the project lifecycle.
Strong local presence or understanding of Klaipėda District Municipality's specific infrastructure context.
A highly experienced and qualified team with relevant certifications and a proven track record.
Social Value Opportunities
Commit to employing local labor where feasible for fieldwork and data collection, contributing to the local economy.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Capability (Infrastructure Registration, GIS, Data Management)

Provide detailed case studies and CVs of key personnel demonstrating extensive experience in similar projects. Outline a clear methodology for data collection, validation, and registration, emphasizing accuracy and efficiency. Highlight any proprietary or advanced technologies used.

PriceLikely High (based on 'lowest price evaluation')

Develop a highly competitive and cost-effective pricing model. Ensure all costs are accounted for, but identify areas for efficiency gains that can be passed on to the client. Consider a lean operational structure.

Green Procurement

Detail specific measures to minimize environmental impact, such as using fuel-efficient vehicles, digital documentation to reduce paper waste, and sustainable waste management practices during any site visits or fieldwork. Quantify potential environmental benefits where possible.

Recommendations6
Thoroughly Address ESPD and Mandatory Requirements
CriticalHigh effort

Ensure 100% compliance with all mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements as outlined in the ESPD request. Any omission or error here will lead to immediate disqualification.

Avoids disqualification.
Prioritize 'Lowest Price' Strategy with Quality Assurance
CriticalHigh effort

Given the indication of 'lowest price evaluation', develop a highly competitive price. However, do not compromise on the quality of the technical proposal. Ensure the technical solution is robust and clearly meets all implied quality standards for infrastructure registration.

Maximizes chances of winning under a price-driven evaluation.
Showcase Green Procurement Expertise
HighMed effort

Develop a detailed and practical plan for implementing green procurement principles. Go beyond generic statements by providing specific examples of how environmental impact will be minimized during the project execution.

Differentiates the bid and meets a stated requirement.
Request Clarification on Corrupted Documents
HighLow effort

Formally request clarification from Klaipėdos rajono savivaldybės administracija regarding the unreadable/corrupted tender documents (DOCUMENT 2, DOCUMENT 3). Document all communication and responses.

Ensures clarity and avoids potential misunderstandings or challenges later.
Develop a Robust Technical Methodology
MediumHigh effort

Since evaluation criteria are not specified, a strong, detailed, and well-articulated technical methodology for infrastructure registration, data management, and quality assurance is crucial. This will implicitly demonstrate capability and value.

Strengthens the bid's perceived value and technical competence.
Incorporate Local Employment Commitment
MediumLow effort

While social value is not mandated, a commitment to employing local personnel for fieldwork can be a subtle differentiator and demonstrate community engagement.

Adds a positive social dimension to the bid.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution without compromising on the accuracy and reliability of infrastructure registration. Emphasize efficiency gains through technology and streamlined processes. Highlight a proactive approach to environmental responsibility, aligning with the 'Green Procurement' requirement.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Basic Requirements

  • Company registration in EU required
  • Proven track record in similar projects
  • Financial stability documentation

Documents

Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.

Login
75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for infrastructure registration in Klaipėda district municipality is generally well-structured, with most essential documents provided. However, the absence of disclosed estimated value and explicit evaluation criteria slightly impacts completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard EU procurement procedures (2014/24/ES) and uses a proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the nature of the tender, and no disputes are noted. The procedure is open, indicating regulatory compliance.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the provided documents (technical specification, special conditions) outline the requirements. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity regarding how bids will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, contact person, contract duration, and tender validity. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and all documents are accessible, promoting fairness. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect. The criteria are objective in principle, but the lack of explicit evaluation criteria could be a concern.

Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is practical. However, the 'No e-submission' flag suggests a potential manual submission process, which is less practical. The contract start date is not specified.

No e-submission (potential)
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. The dates provided are logical within the tender timeline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of focus on these areas.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and contact details provided
Comprehensive set of tender documents available
Use of e-procurement

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Potential for manual submission (contradicts e-procurement characteristic)

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the procurement.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria.
3. Clarify the submission method to ensure full e-submission.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline