Skip to main content
Tenders

Renovation of the municipal road No. B100225500530 "Tutāni - Padomnieki" in Pilskalne parish, Augšdaugava municipality

Open
Deadline
24 days left
April 20, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
168275
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Latgale, Latvia
Published
March 18, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
economically most advantageous offer100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 13, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 20, 2026

Tender Opening

April 20, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
6 months
Location
Latgale
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€491,981
Avg. Bids
3.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
20,606 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Renovation of the municipal road No. B100225500530 "Tutāni - Padomnieki" in Pilskalne parish, Augšdaugava municipality

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

7 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Proposals must be submitted by the deadline of 2026-04-20T11:00:00.
--The evaluation criterion is the economically most advantageous offer based solely on price.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to exclusion grounds as defined in the tender regulations.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must be legally registered entities capable of undertaking the road renovation works.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must demonstrate technical capability to perform road renovation as per the project proposal and technical details.
--Bidders must adhere to the technical specifications outlined in the 'Būvprojekts' document.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Not specified.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168275_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260318051021.pdf -- 97.3 KB

This document outlines the requirements for bidders participating in a tender for the renovation of road Nr. B100225500530 "Tutāni - Padomnieki" in Pilskalne parish, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.

BūvprojektsZIP
Buvprojekts.zip -- 4.6 MB

This document contains a project proposal and technical details for the renovation of the Tutāni-Padomnieki municipal road, including its technical specifications and location plan.

NolikumsDOC
NOLIKUMS_ANPCP_2026_23_Tutani_Padomnieki.doc -- 488.0 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender procedure for the renovation of the road "Tutāni-Padomnieki" in Pilskalne parish, with the evaluation criterion being the economically most advantageous offer based solely on price.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open competition procurement for the renovation of road Nr. B100225500530 in Pilskalne parish, Augšdaugava municipality, with the submission deadline for proposals set for April 20, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for road renovation is generally well-structured with clear technical documentation, but lacks transparency in financial details and specific evaluation criteria beyond price. Document access is also a concern.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures with a clear CPV code and a reasonable timeline. However, the 'Issues: Restricted document access' flag raises a potential concern regarding full legal compliance if critical documents are not accessible to all potential bidders.

Restricted document access
Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the technical specifications are provided in the 'Būvprojekts' document. The AI-extracted requirements are also well-defined, though the evaluation criteria are stated as 'solely on price', which could be more detailed.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the contract duration and tender validity. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission impacting completeness.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is open and uses e-procurement, promoting fairness. The primary evaluation criterion being 'economically most advantageous offer based solely on price' is objective. However, the 'Restricted document access' issue directly impacts fairness by potentially limiting participation.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender is active and uses e-procurement, which is positive. However, the 'No e-submission' flag indicates a potential lack of modern practical submission methods. The contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, only the duration.

No e-submission
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates appear logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not flagged as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on these sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear technical specifications provided
Open procedure with e-procurement characteristics
Reasonable submission deadline and tender validity period
CPV code and location information are present

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Restricted document access
Evaluation criteria stated as solely price, lacking detail
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated contract value for greater transparency.
2. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible to all potential bidders.
3. Consider incorporating broader evaluation criteria beyond just price to encourage quality and innovation.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline