Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Renovation of Augšdaugava Municipality Road No. B100225500530 “Tutāni - Padomnieki” in Pilskalne Parish

Open
Deadline
15 days left
April 20, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
168275
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Latgale, Latvia
Published
March 18, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
economically most advantageous offer100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 13, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 20, 2026

Tender Opening

April 20, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
6 months
Location
Latgale
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€491,981
Avg. Bids
3.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
20,606 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Renovation of Augšdaugava Municipality Road No. B100225500530 “Tutāni - Padomnieki” in Pilskalne Parish

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for road renovation in Augšdaugava municipality is heavily price-driven, making cost leadership and efficient execution paramount. While social and innovative aspects are absent, demonstrating robust technical capability and a clear understanding of the 'Būvprojekts' will be crucial for securing this contract.

Key Winning Messages

The most cost-effective and technically sound solution for the 'Tutāni - Padomnieki' road renovation.

Guaranteed adherence to project specifications with efficient, on-time delivery.

Key Opportunities
Leverage economies of scale and optimized supply chains to offer a highly competitive price.
Thoroughly analyze the 'Būvprojekts' to identify any potential cost-saving efficiencies in execution without compromising quality.
Focus on streamlined project management and resource allocation to ensure the 6-month duration is met efficiently.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to the sole evaluation criterion.

Conduct a detailed cost analysis to identify all possible cost reductions. Explore bulk purchasing of materials and efficient labor deployment. Consider alternative, cost-effective materials if permitted by the 'Būvprojekts'.

Potential for low profit margins if not managed efficiently.

Develop a highly detailed project plan with strict cost controls. Implement robust risk management to avoid unforeseen expenses. Ensure accurate estimation of all direct and indirect costs.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A construction company with proven experience in municipal road infrastructure projects, a strong track record of cost-effective project delivery, and efficient operational capabilities. The ideal bidder will have a lean overhead structure and a highly optimized supply chain to offer the lowest possible price while maintaining quality.
Key Requirements
Adherence to technical specifications outlined in the 'Būvprojekts' document.
Demonstration of technical capability to perform road renovation.
Absence of mandatory exclusion grounds.
Submission by the deadline of 2026-04-20T11:00:00.
Economically most advantageous offer based solely on price.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated ability to deliver similar road renovation projects within budget and on schedule, supported by strong references.
A clear and concise proposal that meticulously addresses every technical requirement of the 'Būvprojekts', showcasing a deep understanding of the scope of work.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider a brief mention of local employment opportunities during project execution, if feasible, to subtly enhance the bid's appeal without incurring significant cost.
Bid Focus Areas
Price100%

Submit the lowest possible price that still allows for a sustainable profit margin. This requires meticulous cost breakdown, efficient resource planning, and potentially leveraging existing supplier relationships for discounts.

Recommendations5
Master the 'Būvprojekts'
CriticalHigh effort

Conduct an exhaustive review of the 'Būvprojekts' document to fully understand all technical specifications, material requirements, and construction methodologies. Identify any ambiguities or areas where cost-effective alternatives might be considered within the stated parameters.

Ensures compliance and identifies potential cost-saving opportunities.
Aggressive Pricing Strategy
CriticalHigh effort

Develop a detailed cost model that allows for the submission of the most competitive price. This involves scrutinizing every cost component, from labor and materials to equipment and overhead. Explore all avenues for discounts and efficiencies.

Directly addresses the primary evaluation criterion and maximizes win probability.
Demonstrate Proven Technical Capability
HighMed effort

Provide clear and compelling evidence of past successful road renovation projects of similar scale and complexity. Include detailed case studies, client testimonials, and relevant certifications to showcase technical expertise and reliability.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to execute the project successfully.
Rigorous Exclusion Ground Check
HighMed effort

Conduct a thorough internal review to ensure the bidder and any subcontractors meet all mandatory exclusion grounds as defined in the tender regulations. This is a non-negotiable requirement for participation.

Prevents disqualification.
Contingency Planning for Price Sensitivity
MediumMed effort

While price is key, build a small, justifiable contingency into the bid for unforeseen issues that could impact cost. This should be presented as a risk mitigation measure to ensure project completion without cost overruns, rather than an inflated price.

Protects against unexpected cost increases and demonstrates foresight.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most efficient and cost-effective solution, emphasizing a lean operational model and optimized resource utilization. Highlight the ability to deliver the required quality at the lowest possible price point, directly appealing to the 'economically most advantageous offer' criterion.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

7 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Proposals must be submitted by the deadline of 2026-04-20T11:00:00.
--The evaluation criterion is the economically most advantageous offer based solely on price.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to exclusion grounds as defined in the tender regulations.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must be legally registered entities capable of undertaking the road renovation works.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must demonstrate technical capability to perform road renovation as per the project proposal and technical details.
--Bidders must adhere to the technical specifications outlined in the 'Būvprojekts' document.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Not specified.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168275_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260318051021.pdf -- 97.3 KB

This document outlines the requirements for bidders participating in a tender for the renovation of road Nr. B100225500530 "Tutāni - Padomnieki" in Pilskalne parish, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.

BūvprojektsZIP
Buvprojekts.zip -- 4.6 MB

This document contains a project proposal and technical details for the renovation of the Tutāni-Padomnieki municipal road, including its technical specifications and location plan.

NolikumsDOC
NOLIKUMS_ANPCP_2026_23_Tutani_Padomnieki.doc -- 488.0 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender procedure for the renovation of the road "Tutāni-Padomnieki" in Pilskalne parish, with the evaluation criterion being the economically most advantageous offer based solely on price.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open competition procurement for the renovation of road Nr. B100225500530 in Pilskalne parish, Augšdaugava municipality, with the submission deadline for proposals set for April 20, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for road renovation is generally well-structured with clear technical documentation, but lacks transparency in financial details and specific evaluation criteria beyond price. Document access is also a concern.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures with a clear CPV code and a reasonable timeline. However, the 'Issues: Restricted document access' flag raises a potential concern regarding full legal compliance if critical documents are not accessible to all potential bidders.

Restricted document access
Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the technical specifications are provided in the 'Būvprojekts' document. The AI-extracted requirements are also well-defined, though the evaluation criteria are stated as 'solely on price', which could be more detailed.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the contract duration and tender validity. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission impacting completeness.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is open and uses e-procurement, promoting fairness. The primary evaluation criterion being 'economically most advantageous offer based solely on price' is objective. However, the 'Restricted document access' issue directly impacts fairness by potentially limiting participation.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender is active and uses e-procurement, which is positive. However, the 'No e-submission' flag indicates a potential lack of modern practical submission methods. The contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, only the duration.

No e-submission
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates appear logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not flagged as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on these sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear technical specifications provided
Open procedure with e-procurement characteristics
Reasonable submission deadline and tender validity period
CPV code and location information are present

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Restricted document access
Evaluation criteria stated as solely price, lacking detail
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated contract value for greater transparency.
2. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible to all potential bidders.
3. Consider incorporating broader evaluation criteria beyond just price to encourage quality and innovation.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline