Skip to main content
Tenders

Renovation of a leisure area in Aloja, Jūras Street 13, within the framework of the implementation of participatory budget projects of the Limbaži Municipality

Open
Deadline
12 days left
April 08, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
168949
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Vidzeme, Latvia
Published
March 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 01, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 08, 2026

Tender Opening

April 08, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
3 months
Location
Vidzeme
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€491,981
Avg. Bids
3.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
20,606 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Renovation of a leisure area in Aloja, Jūras Street 13, within the framework of the implementation of participatory budget projects of the Limbaži Municipality

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

6 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Submission procedures are specified in the document "Nolikums".
--Technical and financial proposal requirements are outlined in the document "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija".
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Exclusion conditions are outlined in the document "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija".
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Eligibility criteria are specified in the document "Nolikums".
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Technical proposal requirements are outlined in the document "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija".
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Financial proposal requirements are outlined in the document "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija".

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168949_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260323153921.pdf -- 96.2 KB

This document outlines the requirements for a tender concerning the renovation of a leisure area in Aloja, Latvia, including exclusion conditions, qualification documents, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.

NolikumsDOC
nolikums58laukums.docx -- 102.9 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender concerning the renovation of a leisure area in Aloja, Latvia, specifying the subject of the procurement, eligibility criteria, and submission procedures.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open tender procedure for the renovation of a leisure playground in Aloja, Latvia.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the renovation of a leisure area in Aloja is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable timeline. However, the undisclosed estimated value and potential restricted document access are notable concerns.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure and provides a CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the scope. The primary concern is the potential for restricted document access, which could impact legal compliance if not resolved.

Restricted document access (potential)
Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the requirements are documented in attached files. The main tender notice provides basic information. However, the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria reduces overall clarity.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, duration, and attached documents. The estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes an open procedure and e-procurement, promoting fairness. Requirements are documented, and criteria are referenced in documents. The lack of disclosed value and potential restricted document access are the main points impacting fairness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Restricted document access (potential)
Practicality65/100

The tender is active and has a clear contract duration. However, the absence of explicit mention of e-submission and financing information limits practicality.

No explicit mention of e-submission
No financing information specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, contributing to high data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, resulting in a moderate score for sustainability.

No green procurement mentioned
No social criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Open procedure and e-procurement
Documented requirements and eligibility criteria
Reasonable timeline and contract duration

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Potential restricted document access

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the procurement.
2. Clearly state the evaluation criteria within the tender notice or accessible documents.
3. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible to all potential bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline