Skip to main content
Tenders

ADS-B monitoring services

Open
Deadline
11 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7128321
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Lithuania
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Tender Opening

April 07, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
12 months
Location
Lithuania
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€131,412
Avg. Bids
3.9
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
98%
2,076 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The estimated procurement value is indicated as "0" in the graph, meaning the estimated procurement value is not publicly disclosed

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

Bendrosios sąlygos (BS) 1.docxDOC
Bendrosios sąlygos (BS) 1.docx -- 82.0 KB

No content extracted

Forma dėl kvalifikacijos (FK) 6.docxDOC
Forma dėl kvalifikacijos (FK) 6.docx -- 36.8 KB

No content extracted

Pasiūlymo forma (PF) 4.docxDOC
Pasiūlymo forma (PF) 4.docx -- 39.2 KB

No content extracted

Paslaugu_sutarties_bendrosios_salygos 7.docxDOC
Paslaugu_sutarties_bendrosios_salygos 7.docx -- 104.8 KB

No content extracted

Paslaugų sutarties specialiosios sąlygos 7.docxDOC
Paslaugų sutarties specialiosios sąlygos 7.do... -- 82.2 KB

No content extracted

Specialiosios sąlygos (SS) 2.docxDOC
Specialiosios sąlygos (SS) 2.docx -- 73.9 KB

No content extracted

Techninė specifikacija (TS) 3.docxDOC
Techninė specifikacija (TS) 3.docx -- 19.2 KB

No content extracted

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_7128321_1.xml

This document contains the structure for an open tender procedure with the lowest price evaluation method, requiring the submission of a complete tender file.

Europos bendrasis viešųjų pirkimų dokumentas (EBVPD) 5.zipZIP
Europos bendrasis viešųjų pirkimų dokumentas ... -- 92.0 KB

This document contains the general conditions, qualification form, and offer form for a public procurement process conducted by the Lithuanian Radio and Television Commission.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for ADS-B monitoring services is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable process. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and financial aspects, and could benefit from more explicit sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to EU procurement directives and uses a standard open procedure. The CPV code is appropriate. While no disputes are noted, the absence of specified evaluation criteria could be a minor compliance concern regarding transparency.

Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear. The availability of multiple document types (technical specifications, general and special conditions) suggests a well-defined scope. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria hinders full clarity on how bids will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, reference, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. While numerous documents are attached, their content summaries are not provided, limiting immediate understanding.

Estimated value not disclosed
Lack of content summaries for attached documents
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The open procedure and clear documentation structure contribute to fairness. The lack of disclosed value and specific eligibility/technical/financial requirements could be perceived as less transparent, but no specific company tailoring is evident.

Estimated value not disclosed
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the absence of a contract start date and explicit financing information reduces practical clarity for potential bidders. The deadline, while specified, might be considered short given the document volume.

Contract start date not specified
Financing information not provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The dates provided are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The '0' value for estimated value is explained, maintaining internal consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation criteria. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which often implies adherence to certain sustainability standards.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Standard EU open procedure
Comprehensive set of tender documents available
E-procurement utilized

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated procurement value.
2. Specify clear evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Incorporate sustainability aspects into the tender requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline