Skip to main content
Tenders

Combat flag

Open
Deadline
13 days left
April 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7127979
Value
€4,132
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 09, 2026

Tender Opening

April 09, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€4,132
Duration
3 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€1,924,601
Avg. Bids
2.4
Competition
Low
SME Winners
77%
360 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Combat flag of the Cyber Defence Unit of the Lithuanian Armed Forces

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

Specialiosios pirkimo sąlygosDOC
Specialiosios pirkimo sąlygos.docx

This document outlines the special procurement conditions for the Lithuanian Armed Forces Cyber Defense Command to acquire a combat flag, detailing the object of procurement, submission requirements, and evaluation criteria.

Supaprastinta prekių sutartis (projektas)DOC
Supaprastinta prekių sutartis.docx

This document contains the draft contract and its appendices, including the technical specification and price for the combat flag of the Lithuanian Armed Forces Cyber Defence Department.

Techninė specifikacijaDOC
Techninė specifikacija.docx

This document contains the technical specifications for the production of a combat flag for the Lithuanian Armed Forces Cyber Defense Command, detailing its design, materials, dimensions, and warranty requirements.

NoticePDF
Notice_7127979.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the procurement of a combat flag for the Lithuanian Armed Forces Cyber Defence Command.

Pasiūlymo formaXLS
2 priedas (Pasiūlymo forma).xlsx

This document contains a proposal form for the Lithuanian Armed Forces Cyber Defence Department's combat flag.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_7127979_1.xml

This document contains the structure for an open tender procedure for the Lithuanian Armed Forces Cyber Defence Department's combat flag, requiring the submission of a complete tender file.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a combat flag is generally well-structured with clear documentation, though it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure (2014/24/ES) and provides a CPV code. Deadlines are specified, and the organization is clearly identified. The absence of disputes and a clear procedure contribute positively. However, the short submission deadline and lack of explicit evaluation criteria could be a minor concern.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear. Mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are listed. Key documents like the technical specification and contract draft are provided, enhancing clarity. The main clarity issue is the absence of specified evaluation criteria.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. Six tender documents are attached, covering contract draft, special conditions, technical specifications, and proposal forms. However, the 'Notice' document is listed but not detailed, and the 'Tender Structure XML' is generic.

Limited detail on 'Notice' document
Generic 'Tender Structure XML' description
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, and the estimated value is disclosed. All documents appear to be accessible. The criteria are objective in principle, but the lack of specified evaluation criteria could lead to subjective interpretation. There are no indications of requirements tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies e-procurement, which is positive. However, the 'Checklist' indicates 'No e-submission', which is a contradiction and a significant practical issue. The contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent. The duration is short (3 months).

Contradiction regarding e-submission (specified as e-procurement but flagged as 'No e-submission')
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The status is 'active', and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logically presented. The contract duration is consistent with the tender information.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear and well-defined technical specifications
Comprehensive set of required documents provided
Open procedure with disclosed estimated value
Active status with no reported disputes

Concerns

Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Contradiction regarding e-submission capability
Lack of sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation)
Short submission deadline

Recommendations

1. Clarify evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
2. Resolve the contradiction regarding e-submission to confirm the submission method.
3. Incorporate sustainability aspects into future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline