Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

One used M2 class city-suburban bus

Open
Deadline
6 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7127685
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Siauliai County, Lithuania
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Tender Opening

April 10, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
2 months
Location
Siauliai County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€703,059
Avg. Bids
3.1
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
96%
2,253 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The contracting authority intends to procure one used M2 class city-suburban bus. Requirements
Green Procurement

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

75%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender requires a used M2 class city-suburban bus, with a minimum of 21 seats and manufactured no earlier than 2014. The key to winning lies in demonstrating exceptional vehicle condition, competitive pricing, and a clear understanding of the 'green procurement' aspect, even for a used vehicle. Focus on proactive documentation and clear communication to address potential ambiguities.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable and compliant used vehicle delivery with a focus on operational readiness.

Cost-effective solution through a well-maintained, pre-owned asset.

Commitment to sustainable transport by extending the life cycle of existing vehicles.

Key Opportunities
Lack of specified evaluation criteria presents an opportunity to define value through superior vehicle condition and comprehensive documentation.
The 'Green Procurement' requirement, even for used vehicles, allows for differentiation by highlighting the environmental benefits of choosing a refurbished or well-maintained used bus over a new one.
The requirement for 'equivalent means' for standards allows for flexibility in demonstrating compliance if specific certifications are not readily available, provided strong evidence is presented.
The short duration of the tender (2 months) suggests a need for prompt and efficient delivery, which can be a competitive advantage if a bidder can guarantee this.
Key Challenges
Absence of detailed technical capability, financial, and submission requirements creates ambiguity and potential for misinterpretation.

Proactively address all potential requirements in the bid, providing more detail than might be strictly necessary. Clearly state assumptions made regarding missing requirements.

The 'used' nature of the bus means condition can be subjective; demonstrating objective proof of quality is crucial.

Provide detailed inspection reports, maintenance history, and high-quality photographic/video evidence of the bus's condition. Offer extended warranties if possible.

Competition from other suppliers offering similar used vehicles, potentially at lower prices.

Focus on total cost of ownership, reliability, and compliance. Highlight the long-term value and reduced risk associated with a well-inspected and documented vehicle.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A supplier with a well-maintained inventory of used M2 class buses, a strong track record in providing vehicles for public transport, and the ability to provide comprehensive documentation for compliance with Lithuanian regulations. They should also be adept at highlighting the sustainability aspects of offering a refurbished or well-maintained used vehicle.
Key Requirements
Used M2 class city-suburban bus
Diesel fuel
Manufactured no earlier than 2014 (first registration)
Minimum 21 seats (excluding driver)
Bus must be suitable for operation in the Republic of Lithuania
Valid tachograph inspection certificate in the Republic of Lithuania
Price in EUR, including VAT, delivery costs, and all taxes
Opportunity for inspection by the Contracting Authority
Key Discriminators
Comprehensive pre-sale inspection reports with clear evidence of excellent mechanical and cosmetic condition.
Detailed maintenance history and service records.
Proactive provision of all necessary documentation for Lithuanian registration and operation, including a valid tachograph certificate.
A clear statement on how the offering contributes to 'green procurement' by extending the vehicle's lifecycle.
Social Value Opportunities
Commitment to supporting local employment during any refurbishment or preparation of the bus, if applicable. (While 'Social Aspects: No', demonstrating a positive community impact can be a subtle differentiator).
Bid Focus Areas
Vehicle Condition and Compliance

Provide extensive photographic and video evidence of the bus's condition. Include detailed inspection reports from independent mechanics. Clearly list all features and specifications that meet or exceed the technical requirements. Emphasize the 'suitable for operation in the Republic of Lithuania' aspect with supporting documentation.

Pricing and Value

Present a clear, all-inclusive price. Justify the price by highlighting the quality, condition, and compliance of the vehicle, demonstrating a strong value proposition beyond just the lowest bid.

Documentation and Readiness

Ensure all required documents (tachograph certificate, proof of suitability for Lithuanian operation) are readily available and presented clearly. Offer to provide additional documentation proactively.

Green Procurement

Articulate the environmental benefits of purchasing a used, well-maintained bus, such as reduced manufacturing emissions and resource consumption compared to a new vehicle. Frame it as a responsible and sustainable choice.

Recommendations6
Thoroughly Document Vehicle Condition
CriticalHigh effort

Go beyond basic requirements. Provide high-resolution photos and videos of the bus's interior, exterior, engine bay, and undercarriage. Include detailed inspection reports from a reputable third-party mechanic, highlighting any wear and tear and confirming its operational readiness.

Builds trust and demonstrates compliance, mitigating concerns about the 'used' nature of the asset.
Proactively Address Missing Evaluation Criteria
CriticalMed effort

Since evaluation criteria are not specified, assume price and technical compliance will be paramount. Structure the bid to clearly demonstrate superior technical compliance and a competitive, transparent price. Highlight the value proposition of reliability and long-term operational efficiency.

Ensures the bid is well-received and addresses the likely decision-making factors.
Emphasize 'Green Procurement' Aspect
HighLow effort

Explicitly state how offering a used, well-maintained bus aligns with green procurement principles by extending the vehicle's lifecycle and reducing the environmental impact associated with manufacturing new vehicles. Quantify benefits if possible (e.g., CO2 savings from avoiding new production).

Addresses the 'GREEN PROCUREMENT: Yes' requirement and positions the bidder as environmentally conscious.
Prepare All Lithuanian Compliance Documents in Advance
HighMed effort

Ensure the tachograph certificate is valid and readily available. Have documentation confirming the bus's suitability for operation in Lithuania (e.g., type approval, conformity certificates if applicable) prepared and easily accessible. This demonstrates preparedness and reduces risk for the buyer.

Minimizes delays and demonstrates a professional, well-prepared supplier.
Clarify Ambiguities in Tender Documents
MediumLow effort

If any requirements are unclear (e.g., specific technical standards not detailed), submit a formal clarification request to the contracting authority well before the submission deadline. If clarification is not possible, clearly state assumptions made in the bid.

Prevents disqualification due to misinterpretation and shows diligence.
Highlight Extended Vehicle Life Cycle
LowLow effort

Frame the offering as a sustainable choice that maximizes the utility of existing resources, contributing to a circular economy. This aligns with broader sustainability goals even if not explicitly a social value requirement.

Subtly enhances the bid's appeal by aligning with modern procurement trends.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as offering the best balance of price, quality, and compliance. Highlight the proactive approach to documentation and readiness for operation in Lithuania. Emphasize the sustainability aspect of choosing a well-maintained used vehicle.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the tender document]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the tender document]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the tender document]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--To acquire a used M2 class urban-suburban bus.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the tender document]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

Pasiūlymo forma (1 priedas)DOC
Pasiūlymo forma (1 priedas).docx

This document is a bid form template for a tender to acquire a used M2 class city-suburban bus, requiring the bidder to confirm compliance with tender conditions and provide pricing and vehicle details.

Sutarties projektas (4 priedas)DOC
Sutarties projektas (4 priedas).docx

This document contains the general terms and conditions for a contract for the purchase and sale of goods, outlining definitions, interpretation rules, and document hierarchy.

Techninė specifikacija (3 priedas)DOC
Techninė specifikacija (3 priedas).docx

This document contains the technical specifications for a used M2 class city-suburban bus, detailing requirements for its age, seating capacity, fuel type, and condition, as well as submission and inspection procedures.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 92.2 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_7127685.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the procurement of one used M2 class city-suburban bus by UŽDAROJI AKCINĖ BENDROVĖ ''Kelmės autobusų parkas'' in Lithuania.

README.txtTXT
README.txt -- 835 B

This document contains an ESPD request in XML format, related to the procurement of a used M2 class city-suburban bus.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_7127685_1.xml

This document outlines the structure for a complete tender submission, requiring a file to be uploaded.

espd-request.xmlXML
espd-request.xml -- 139.5 KB

This document is a request for an ESPD (European Single Procurement Document) related to the procurement of a used M2 class city-suburban bus.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a used bus is generally well-structured but lacks specific evaluation criteria and financial details, impacting its overall quality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general procurement regulations with a clear procedure and CPV code. However, the absence of a reveal date for submissions and the potential for a short deadline raise minor concerns regarding procedural transparency and fairness.

Missing reveal date for submissions
Potential for short deadline
Clarity80/100

The description of the required item is clear, and the presence of a technical specification document enhances clarity. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria leaves bidders uncertain about how their proposals will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, reference, and CPV code. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the contract duration is very short (2 months), which might be insufficient for the intended purpose or procurement of a used bus.

Estimated value not disclosed
Contract duration is very short (2 months)
Fairness85/100

The tender is open and uses e-procurement, promoting accessibility. Requirements are not tailored to specific companies. However, the lack of disclosed value and specific evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent.

Estimated value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the contract duration of only 2 months is exceptionally short and may not be practical for acquiring and integrating a used bus. Financing information is also missing.

Contract duration is very short (2 months)
Financing information not provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The tender is active and there are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on these sustainability dimensions.

No green procurement mentioned
No social criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear CPV code and title
E-Procurement utilized
Documents are available and analyzed
Active status with no disputes

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Very short contract duration (2 months)

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the procurement.
2. Specify clear and objective evaluation criteria.
3. Re-evaluate the contract duration to ensure practicality.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline