Skip to main content
Tenders

Simple renovation of office A22

Open
Deadline
6 days left
April 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7127012
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Klaipeda County, Lithuania
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 02, 2026

Tender Opening

April 02, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
3 months
Location
Klaipeda County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€6,132,447
Avg. Bids
4.1
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
90%
960 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Procurement of renovation works for office A22 in the building at Taikos pr. 67, Klaipėda. The office has installed
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

NoticePDF
Notice_7127012.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the simple renovation of office A22 at Taikos pr. 67, Klaipėda, Lithuania, including specific renovation tasks and submission requirements.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_7127012_1.xml

This document outlines the structure for a simplified open tender procedure for office renovation works, requiring the submission of a complete tender file.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for cabinet renovation is generally well-structured but lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and financial aspects, impacting completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to follow standard open procedure rules. CPV code is provided, and no disputes are indicated. The deadline, while short, is within a reasonable timeframe for a simple renovation. The lack of specified evaluation criteria is a minor concern for legal compliance.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the location is specified. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria makes it difficult to fully assess the clarity of the selection process.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Basic information like title, organization, and CPV code is present. The contract duration is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the AI-extracted requirements section is empty, indicating a lack of detailed documentation for exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial capabilities.

Estimated value not disclosed
No specific requirements listed for exclusion, eligibility, technical, or financial capabilities
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and e-procurement is indicated, promoting fairness. However, the undisclosed estimated value and the lack of specified objective evaluation criteria could potentially lead to less transparency in the selection process.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender is active and has a submission deadline. E-procurement is mentioned. However, the contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent. The short submission deadline might also pose a practical challenge.

Contract start date not specified
Financing information not provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and CPV code are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The AI-extracted requirements being empty is noted but does not create logical inconsistencies within the provided data.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender. It is also not indicated as EU funded.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and CPV code provided
Documents available for download
E-procurement indicated

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing detailed evaluation criteria
Lack of specific eligibility and capability requirements
Absence of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated contract value for greater transparency.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for bidders.
3. Include specific requirements for bidder eligibility and capabilities.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline