Skip to main content
Tenders

Plot arrangement (plot plan) works (P. Širvio g. 2 and Taikos g. 17, Rokiškis)

Open
Deadline
18 days left
April 14, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7124931
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Panevezys County, Lithuania
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 07, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 14, 2026

Tender Opening

April 14, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
8 months
Location
Panevezys County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€6,132,447
Avg. Bids
4.1
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
90%
960 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Plot arrangement (plot plan) works (P. Širvio g. 2 and Taikos g. 17, Rokiškis). The subject of the procurement
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information on submission requirements.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information on mandatory exclusion grounds.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information on eligibility requirements.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information on technical capability requirements.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information on financial requirements.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

Bendrosios sąlygosDOC
Sklypo sutvarkymo darbai 2026-03-26_SP AK ben...

This document contains general terms and conditions for a public procurement process, defining key terms and outlining the structure and hierarchy of procurement documents.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 79.4 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_7124931.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for site development works, specifically paving of pedestrian paths in Rokiškis, Lithuania, divided into two lots.

README.txtTXT
README.txt -- 835 B

This document contains a corrupted file named README.txt, likely related to a tender for landscaping works.

espd-request.xmlXML
espd-request.xml -- 102.9 KB

This document contains a request for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) in relation to a tender for site development works.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for site arrangement works in Rokiškis is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a standard EU procurement procedure. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financial requirements, impacting its overall completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender follows a standard open procedure (2014/24/EU) and utilizes the correct CPV code. The presence of a contract notice and general terms and conditions indicates adherence to basic legal frameworks. The deadline, while potentially short, is specified. No disputes are noted.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the attached documents, including technical specifications and project plans, provide good detail. The use of standard forms like ESPD and general conditions contributes to clarity.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, organization, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details regarding eligibility, technical, and financial requirements are missing from the AI-extracted sections, despite the presence of relevant documents like 'Pašalinimo pagrindai' and 'Specialiosios sąlygos' which might contain this information. The AI-extracted requirements section is notably empty.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing AI-extracted eligibility, technical, and financial requirements
Fairness85/100

The tender is open and uses e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The value is not disclosed, which is a minor concern for fairness. Crucially, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed, potentially impacting fairness.

Evaluation criteria not specified
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting electronic submission is possible. The contract duration is specified. However, the AI-extracted section does not confirm e-submission details or financing information, and the 'README.txt' document being corrupted is a minor practical issue.

Corrupted README.txt document
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. The tender is active and has no noted suspensions or disputes. The dates provided are logical within the context of a tender process.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded' and 'E-Procurement'. However, there is no explicit mention or indication of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information, limiting its sustainability score.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of works and attached project documents
Standard EU open procedure followed
E-Procurement indicated
All basic tender information present (title, reference, organization, duration)

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing specific evaluation criteria
AI-extracted requirements section is empty, suggesting potential missing details in the tender documents themselves

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for submitted bids.
3. Ensure all essential requirements (eligibility, technical, financial) are explicitly stated or easily accessible within the tender documents.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline