Skip to main content
Tenders

Television (98-inch diagonal)

Open
Deadline
16 days left
April 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7124215
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Kaunas County, Lithuania
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 13, 2026

Tender Opening

April 14, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
12 months
Location
Kaunas County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€271,089
Avg. Bids
2.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
96%
558 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Television (98-inch diagonal)
EU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No requirements provided.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No requirements provided.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No requirements provided.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No requirements provided.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No requirements provided.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

Deklaracija (priedas nr. 2)DOC
2 priedas - deklaracija del prekiu kilmes (...

This document is a bidder's declaration confirming that the origin of the goods or services is not from restricted territories like the Russian Federation, Belarus, or certain regions of Ukraine, Moldova, and Georgia.

Įsigijimo sąlygosDOC
isigijimo salygos .docx

This document outlines the terms and conditions for a low-value procurement of televisions by the Lithuanian Army's Major Juozas Lukša Training Centre, specifying submission requirements and evaluation criteria.

Pasiūlymo pateikimo formaDOC
Pasiūlymo pateikimo forma.docx

This document is a bid submission form for the acquisition of a 98-inch television, requiring the bidder to agree to all procurement conditions and provide details about their offer and accompanying documents.

SutartisDOC
SUPAPRASTINTA SUTARTIS.docx

This document is an annex to a contract, detailing product names, requirements, units of measure, and quantities for the purchase of a 98-inch television.

NoticePDF
Notice_7124215.pdf

This document is a tender notice for the procurement of a 98-inch color television by the Lithuanian Army's Ground Forces Juozas Lukša Training Centre.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_7124215_1.xml

This document outlines the structure for a simplified open tender procedure for a 98-inch television, requiring the submission of a complete tender file.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a 98-inch television is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and detailed financial information. The sustainability aspects are minimal.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements, including a clear CPV code and a stated procedure. However, the absence of a reveal date for submissions and the lack of specified evaluation criteria could pose minor compliance risks.

Missing reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The description of the required item (98-inch television) is clear. The attached documents provide necessary forms and a draft contract, contributing to good clarity. However, the lack of explicit eligibility, technical, and financial requirements leaves some ambiguity.

No specific eligibility requirements provided
No specific technical capability requirements provided
Completeness70/100

Most essential information is present, including the title, reference, organization, and contract duration. The availability of six documents, including forms and a draft contract, enhances completeness. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and specific exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements are missing.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Missing specific exclusion grounds
Fairness85/100

The tender is open and uses e-procurement, promoting fairness. The disclosure of the draft contract and submission forms allows bidders to understand the process. The absence of disclosed estimated value and specific criteria could be perceived as a minor fairness concern, but no company-specific tailoring is evident.

Practicality65/100

The tender is active and has a submission deadline. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and while e-procurement is mentioned, the specific e-submission mechanism is not detailed. The contract duration is specified.

No e-submission mechanism detailed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and CPV code are populated. The dates provided (submission and opening) are logical. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which implies adherence to certain EU standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender documents or requirements.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear CPV code and item description
Comprehensive set of required documents provided
Active e-procurement process
EU Funded status

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Lack of specific evaluation criteria
Absence of detailed eligibility, technical, and financial requirements
Limited sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated contract value to enhance transparency.
2. Clearly define evaluation criteria to guide bidders and ensure objective selection.
3. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., energy efficiency, recycled materials) if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline