Revitalization of Oskaras Goeldneris Square, adapting it to community needs, design and project

This tender for engineering design services for the revitalization of Oskar Goeldnerio Square is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and attached documents. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and submission methods, impacting practicality and clarity.

The tender adheres to EU procurement directives and uses a proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the submission date. No disputes are indicated. The procedure is open, suggesting regulatory compliance.

The description of the service is concise but could be more detailed. Key requirements such as exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial criteria are not explicitly provided in the main tender notice, relying on attached documents. The absence of specified evaluation criteria is a notable gap.

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, contract duration, and CPV code. However, the AI-extracted requirements section is empty, suggesting that detailed criteria might be buried within the numerous attached documents, which could be a point of concern for bidders needing quick access to essential information.

The tender is an open procedure, and the estimated value is disclosed. The use of e-procurement is indicated. There are no obvious signs of requirements tailored to specific companies. Access to documents is provided, although the structure of the documents (ZIP files) might require extra effort to navigate.

The tender indicates e-procurement, which is positive. However, the specific e-submission process is not detailed. The contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, and financing information is absent. The reliance on multiple ZIP files for key documents might reduce practical usability.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The tender status is active, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates are logically presented.

The tender is marked as EU Funded, which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information.