Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Belts and leggings

Open
Deadline
24 days left
April 28, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7120038
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 21, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 28, 2026

Tender Opening

April 28, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
36 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€267,463
Avg. Bids
5.0
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
97%
739 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of procurement is belts and leggings. The subject of procurement is divided into 3 (three) parts: 1 White belt
Green Procurement

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for belts and leg guards, though seemingly straightforward, requires a meticulous approach to mandatory requirements and a clear demonstration of technical capability. Given the lack of specified evaluation criteria, a focus on meeting all mandatory requirements flawlessly and presenting a robust, compliant technical solution will be paramount. Leveraging the 'Green Procurement' aspect and demonstrating value beyond basic compliance will be key differentiators.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable and Compliant Supplier for Essential Military Equipment

Commitment to Sustainable Procurement Practices

Key Opportunities
Demonstrate superior technical capability and product quality.
Leverage 'Green Procurement' to differentiate.
Thoroughly address all mandatory requirements to avoid exclusion.
Key Challenges
Undefined Evaluation Criteria

Since evaluation criteria are not specified, the strategy must be to excel in all mandatory areas and present the most robust and compliant technical solution possible. Assume a 'most economically advantageous tender' approach where quality, compliance, and value are implicitly weighted. Focus on exceeding minimum requirements where possible without incurring unnecessary costs.

Potential for high competition due to lack of specific technical barriers.

While technical capability is required, the lack of detailed specifications for the belts and leg guards might attract a broad range of suppliers. Focus on clear, concise documentation of existing capabilities and a strong value proposition that emphasizes reliability and sustainability.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A manufacturer or established supplier of military or tactical apparel with proven experience in producing high-quality belts and leg guards. The ideal bidder will have a strong understanding of material specifications, durability testing, and potentially experience with government contracts. They must also possess the capacity to meet 'Green Procurement' requirements and demonstrate efficient production processes.
Key Requirements
Mandatory Exclusion Grounds
Eligibility Requirements
Technical Capability Requirements
Financial Requirements
Submission Requirements
Green Procurement Compliance
Key Discriminators
Demonstrable commitment to and evidence of 'Green Procurement' principles in manufacturing and material sourcing.
Proactive and detailed documentation of technical capabilities, including material certifications, quality control processes, and any relevant testing.
A clear and concise submission that meticulously addresses all mandatory requirements, leaving no room for ambiguity or omission.
Social Value Opportunities
Commit to using sustainably sourced or recycled materials where feasible for the belts and leg guards, and detail this in the bid. Highlight any partnerships with suppliers who adhere to ethical labor practices.
Bid Focus Areas
Mandatory Requirements (Exclusion, Eligibility, Technical, Financial, Submission)N/A (Pass/Fail)

Ensure 100% compliance. Dedicate significant resources to meticulously review and complete all sections of the ESPD and any other required documentation. Cross-reference all requirements against internal processes and capabilities. Seek legal/expert review if necessary.

Technical CapabilityN/A (Assumed High Importance)

Provide detailed product specifications, material data sheets, quality control procedures, and evidence of past performance in similar product categories. If possible, include details on durability and performance testing relevant to military applications.

Green ProcurementN/A (Assumed High Importance)

Clearly articulate how the bidder will meet the 'Green Procurement' requirements. This could include details on material sourcing (e.g., recycled content, eco-friendly dyes), manufacturing processes (e.g., energy efficiency, waste reduction), and packaging. Quantify benefits where possible.

Recommendations6
Meticulous ESPD Completion
CriticalHigh effort

Ensure the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) is completed accurately and comprehensively, addressing all mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements. Any errors or omissions can lead to immediate disqualification.

Avoids disqualification and ensures the bid is considered.
Proactive Green Procurement Strategy
HighMed effort

Develop a detailed and evidence-based 'Green Procurement' strategy. This should go beyond mere compliance and highlight specific initiatives, such as sustainable material sourcing, reduced environmental impact in manufacturing, and eco-friendly packaging. Quantify benefits where possible.

Creates a significant differentiator and appeals to the Contracting Authority's stated requirement.
Demonstrate Robust Technical Capability
HighMed effort

Provide detailed technical documentation for the belts and leg guards, including material specifications, quality control processes, and any relevant certifications or testing results. Emphasize durability, functionality, and adherence to any implied military standards.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to deliver high-quality products.
Clarify Ambiguities (If Possible)
MediumLow effort

If any aspect of the tender requirements, particularly regarding technical specifications or 'Green Procurement' expectations, is unclear, utilize the official communication channels to seek clarification from the Contracting Authority. Document all communications.

Ensures a precise and compliant bid, reducing risk of misinterpretation.
Internal Compliance Check
CriticalMed effort

Conduct a thorough internal review of all submission documents against the tender requirements before submission. This should include a cross-check of all mandatory criteria, eligibility, and technical capabilities.

Minimizes the risk of human error leading to disqualification.
Highlight Supply Chain Sustainability
MediumLow effort

If applicable, detail any efforts to ensure sustainability and ethical practices within the supply chain for raw materials. This can further enhance the 'Green Procurement' aspect.

Adds depth to the sustainability claims and demonstrates a holistic approach.
Competitive Positioning
Position as a reliable, quality-focused supplier with a strong commitment to sustainability, leveraging the 'Green Procurement' requirement as a key differentiator. Emphasize adherence to all mandatory requirements with absolute precision.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Documents

13 documents available with AI summaries

2 priedas 1 dalisDOC
2 priedo 1 priedelis (1 pirkimo dalis).docx

This document outlines the technical specifications for a white leather belt, forming the first part of a tender for belts and shin guards.

2 priedas 2 dalisDOC
2 priedo 1 priedelis (2 pirkimo dalis).docx

This document contains technical parameters for a white leather belt for orchestra members and cadets, requiring bidders to confirm compliance and provide specific technical values supported by laboratory test reports.

2 priedas 3 dalisDOC
2 priedo 1 priedelis (3 pirkimo dalis).docx

This document contains technical parameters for shin guards (GSK) as part of the third part of a tender for belts and shin guards, requiring bidders to confirm their proposed items meet specified technical requirements and provide laboratory test results.

4 priedo priedėlisDOC
4 priedo priedelis Sutarciu sarasas.docx

This document is an appendix to the tender conditions, specifically a list of successfully completed contracts related to the procurement object (belts and leggings) over the last 3 years.

Pirkimo sąlygosDOC
Dirzu ir blauzdiniu pirkimo salygos.docx

This document contains the terms and conditions for an open tender procedure by the Defense Resources Agency for the procurement of belts and gaiters, divided into three parts.

Pirkimo sąlygų 4 priedasDOC
Pirkimo salygu 4 priedas Tiekeju pasalinimo p...

This document outlines the exclusion grounds for suppliers and the qualification requirements for the procurement of belts and shin guards, divided into three parts.

Pirkimo sąlygų 6 priedasDOC
Pirkimo salygu 6 priedas NACdeklaracija.docx

This document is a bidder's declaration confirming compliance with national security requirements, including restrictions related to Russia and Belarus, and adherence to international sanctions.

Pirkimo sąlygų 7 priedasDOC
Pirkimo sąlygų 7 priedas Del prekes pakuotes...

This document is a declaration by the supplier confirming that the product packaging complies with environmental protection requirements for green public procurement.

Priedas 1PDF
1 dalies technines specifikacijos priedas Dir...

This document contains technical specifications and illustrations for white belts, leg guards, and a knife-dagger sheath, divided into three parts for procurement.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 78.5 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_7120038.pdf

This document is a tender notice for the procurement of belts and gaiters, divided into three lots, with specific technical requirements and submission procedures outlined.

README.txtTXT
README.txt -- 835 B

This document contains a README file with encrypted content related to a tender for belts and leg guards, divided into three parts.

espd-request.xmlXML
espd-request.xml -- 102.7 KB

This document contains a request for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) for a tender concerning belts and leg guards, divided into three parts.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for belts and gaiters is generally well-structured with clear documentation, though it lacks specific evaluation criteria and financing details. The e-procurement aspect is positive, but the absence of sustainability considerations limits its overall score.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard open procedure requirements and includes a proper CPV code. Deadlines are present, and the procedure is generally clear. No disputes are indicated. The primary concern is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which could impact legal compliance if not addressed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Clarity80/100

The description of the procurement object is clear, and technical specifications are provided for each part. Requirements are documented, but the absence of explicit evaluation criteria makes the overall conditions less clear.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, contract duration, and organizational details. A comprehensive set of 13 documents is provided, covering technical specifications, exclusion grounds, and qualification requirements. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and financing information is absent.

Estimated Value not disclosed
Financing information absent
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting accessibility. Requirements appear objective, and the division into parts allows for broader participation. Full document access is implied by the number of documents provided. No specific company tailoring is evident.

Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting electronic submission. A contract start date is not explicitly stated, and financing information is missing, which can affect practical planning for bidders.

Contract start date not specified
Financing information absent
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The CPV code is correctly assigned.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender details. The tender is not indicated as EU funded.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear division into parts
Comprehensive documentation provided
E-Procurement enabled
Clear CPV code and reference number

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Estimated value not disclosed
Lack of sustainability considerations
Missing financing information

Recommendations

1. Specify evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
2. Disclose the estimated value and financing details to aid bidder planning.
3. Incorporate sustainability aspects (green, social, innovation) if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline