Skip to main content
Tenders

Adaptation of Babėnai Forest for recreation and leisure, reconstruction works (SAK)

Open
Deadline
19 days left
April 15, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7119190
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Kaunas County, Lithuania
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 08, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 15, 2026

Tender Opening

April 15, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
19 months
Location
Kaunas County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€6,132,447
Avg. Bids
4.1
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
90%
960 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

In accordance with the simplified project "Adaptation of Babėnai Forest for recreation and leisure" and the List of Activities.
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

12 documents available with AI summaries

7 priedasDOC
7_priedas_Vertinimo_metodika.doc

No content extracted

9 priedasDOC
9 priedas_-_Veiklos_sarasas.doc

No content extracted

3 priedasDOC
3 priedas SAK pašalinimo pagrindai.docx

This document outlines the grounds for exclusion from a procurement procedure, specifying that only the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) is initially required, with supporting documents requested only from the most economically advantageous bidder.

6 priedasDOC
6 priedas pasiulymo forma.docx

This document is a tender offer form for the reconstruction works of Babėnų šilas for recreation and leisure, requiring bidders to provide information about themselves, subcontractors, and the total price.

8 priedasDOC
8 priedas Sutarties_projektas_(Babenu_silas)....

This document contains a draft reconstruction services contract for the adaptation of Babėnų šilas for recreation and leisure, outlining the object of the contract, price, and execution terms.

Bendrosios pirkimo sąlygosDOC
SAK Bendrosios konkurso sąlygos.docx

This document contains general procurement conditions, defining terms and outlining the procurement process for acquiring goods or services related to the "Babėnų šilo pritaikymas poilsiui ir laisvalaikiui" project.

Specialiosios pirkimo sąlygosDOC
SAK Specialiosios konkurso sąlygos Babenu sil...

This document contains the special conditions for a simplified public procurement tender for the adaptation of Babėnų forest for recreation and leisure, including reconstruction works.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 78.9 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_7119190.pdf

This document is a tender notice for the reconstruction and adaptation of Babėnų šilas for recreation and leisure, including pedestrian path construction and cadastral surveying services in Lithuania.

README.txtTXT
README.txt -- 835 B

This document contains a corrupted ESPD request file, likely related to a project for adapting Babėnai forest for recreation.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_7119190_1.xml

This document contains the structure for an open tender procedure, specifically for Round 1, requiring the submission of a complete tender file.

espd-request.xmlXML
espd-request.xml -- 102.8 KB

This document contains a request for an electronic standard procurement document (ESPD).

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for reconstruction works in Babėnai forest is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a defined procedure. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financing, impacting its overall practicality and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures (Open procedure, EU directive 2014/24/ES) and includes a CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the submission date. No disputes are noted. The primary concern is the lack of explicitly stated evaluation criteria, which could be a regulatory oversight.

Missing evaluation criteria
Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear, outlining the project's purpose. Key documents like the contract draft and general terms are provided. However, the absence of specific eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements makes it difficult for bidders to fully understand all expectations.

No specific eligibility requirements listed
No specific technical capability requirements listed
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, contact person, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details regarding specific bidder requirements are missing from the AI-extracted list, suggesting these might be buried within the 13 documents.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Missing specific requirements in AI extraction
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and the procedure is standard. The value is not disclosed, which is a minor concern for fairness. The lack of specific, objective criteria for evaluation is a significant drawback, potentially leading to subjective assessments. E-procurement is indicated, which is positive.

Value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

While e-procurement is mentioned, the AI analysis indicates 'No e-submission', which is contradictory and needs clarification. The absence of financing information and contract start date reduces practicality. The deadline, while active, might be tight depending on the complexity of the required documents.

No e-submission (contradictory)
Financing information missing
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. The CPV code is present. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical. The main inconsistency is the 'No e-submission' flag despite 'E-Procurement' being listed as a characteristic.

Contradiction between 'E-Procurement' characteristic and 'No e-submission' flag
Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear project title and description
Standard open procurement procedure
CPV code provided
Multiple relevant documents attached

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Estimated value not disclosed
Lack of specific eligibility/technical/financial requirements
Potential contradiction regarding e-submission

Recommendations

1. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria.
2. Disclose the estimated contract value.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline