Installation of synthetic surfacing for parking lots in Telšiai District Municipality (Published survey)

This tender for synthetic court surfacing in Telšiai district is generally well-structured but lacks specific evaluation criteria and detailed technical requirements within the main notice. The reliance on Annex 3 for crucial details impacts clarity and completeness.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of CPV codes and a clear procedure type. Deadlines are provided, though their reasonableness is a point of concern. No disputes are reported.

The core description is brief, with essential details like requirements and technical specifications deferred to Annex 3. While the existence of Annex 3 is noted, its absence from direct view in the main notice reduces immediate clarity for potential bidders.

Basic information such as title, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are present. However, the crucial technical and eligibility requirements are not fully detailed within the main tender document, relying heavily on external annexes.

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The estimated value is disclosed, and criteria are expected to be objective, though not explicitly stated in the main notice. There is no indication of requirements tailored to specific companies.

The tender is advertised as e-procurement, which is positive. However, the contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent. The reliance on Annex 3 for key details also impacts practical usability.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The status is active, and no disputes or suspensions are noted, indicating good internal consistency.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. It is also not indicated as EU funded.