Skip to main content
Tenders

Beanbags

Open
Deadline
4 days left
March 31, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7112708
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Klaipeda County, Lithuania
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 31, 2026

Tender Opening

March 31, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
2 months
Location
Klaipeda County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€69,654
Avg. Bids
3.6
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
98%
1,750 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Beanbags 12 pcs.
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

Tiekejo deklaracija_ Atitikimas aplinkosaugos reikalavimusDOC
5priedas_Tiekėjo_deklaracija_aplinkosaugos.do...

This document is a declaration by the supplier confirming compliance with environmental requirements for furniture, including specific substance limitations and proof of compliance.

Pasiūlymo formaDOC
2priedas_Technine_specifikacija_sedmaišiai.do...

This document contains the technical specifications for the supply of 12 beanbags, outlining general requirements, delivery, waste removal, material specifications, and required compliance documents.

Techninė specifikacijaDOC
2priedas_Technine_specifikacija_sedmaišiai.do...

This document contains the technical specifications for the procurement of 12 beanbags, detailing general requirements, warranty, defect removal, delivery, waste disposal, material safety, and specific parameters.

sutarties projektasDOC
3priedas_Sutarties_projektas_sedmaisiai.docx

This document contains a draft contract for the purchase and sale of 12 beanbags, detailing terms related to price, payment, quality, warranty, delivery, and liability.

Tiekejo deklaracija. Atitikimas TSDOC
4priedas_Tiekejo_deklaracija_AtitikimasTS.doc...

This document is a supplier's declaration confirming compliance with the technical specifications for the supply of beanbags.

pirkimo sąlygosDOC
pirkimo_salygos_sedmaisiai.docx

This document contains the procurement conditions for the purchase of 12 beanbags by Klaipėdos Ernesto Galvanausko Professional Training Centre.

NoticePDF
Notice_7112708.pdf

This document is a tender notice for the procurement of 12 beanbag chairs by VŠĮ Klaipėdos Ernesto Galvanausko Profesinio mokymo centras in Lithuania.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_7112708_1.xml

This document contains the structure for a simplified open tender for 12 beanbags, requiring a complete tender submission.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for beanbags is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financing, impacting its overall practicality and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a clear CPV code and a defined procedure. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline appears tight. No disputes are noted. The procedure is open, suggesting regulatory compliance.

Clarity80/100

The description of the required items (12 beanbags) is clear. Technical specifications and contract drafts are provided, offering good detail on requirements. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria creates ambiguity.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, reference number, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure with all documents accessible, promoting fairness. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect. However, the lack of disclosed value and unspecified evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent.

Value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is practical. However, the lack of explicit financing information and the short submission deadline (6 days) reduce its practicality for potential bidders.

Deadline may be too short
Value not disclosed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and CPV code are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The contract duration is specified.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'EU Funded' and includes a declaration for environmental compliance, which are positive. However, there are no explicit requirements for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation.

Not green procurement (explicitly)
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear CPV code and technical specifications
E-procurement utilized
All tender documents are accessible
EU Funded characteristic noted

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Short submission deadline
Lack of explicit green/social/innovation criteria

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for submitted proposals.
3. Consider extending the submission deadline to allow for more comprehensive participation.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline