Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Zarasai District Municipality Dusetos Village, Eglyno St. 1c, DGASA PP, TDP, Project Implementation Supervision and Environmental

Open
Deadline
14 days left
April 19, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7110392
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Utena County, Lithuania
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 12, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 19, 2026

Tender Opening

April 19, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
36 months
Location
Utena County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€131,412
Avg. Bids
3.9
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
98%
2,076 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The contracting authority intends to acquire Zarasai District Municipality Dusetos Village, Eglyno St. 1c, DGASA PP, TDP, Project
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender requires comprehensive engineering design, project execution supervision, and environmental documentation for a waste management facility. A winning strategy will focus on demonstrating technical expertise, a deep understanding of environmental regulations, and efficient project management, while leveraging the 'Green Procurement' aspect to differentiate.

Key Winning Messages

Expertise in sustainable waste management infrastructure design and execution.

Proven ability to deliver complex environmental engineering projects on time and within budget.

Commitment to environmental stewardship and regulatory compliance.

Key Opportunities
Leverage 'Green Procurement' to highlight sustainable design solutions and materials.
Demonstrate a thorough understanding of Lithuanian environmental regulations and permitting processes.
Offer a comprehensive project management approach that ensures efficient delivery of design, supervision, and environmental documentation.
Key Challenges
Lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to optimize bid scoring.

Assume a balanced approach, prioritizing technical merit, price (if applicable), and demonstrated understanding of green procurement. Focus on exceeding minimum requirements in all areas.

Estimated value not disclosed could indicate a wide range of potential bids or a desire for competitive pricing.

Develop a cost-effective yet high-quality solution. Benchmark against similar projects if possible and be prepared to justify pricing based on scope and expertise.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A well-established engineering consultancy with proven experience in waste management infrastructure projects, environmental impact assessments, and project supervision in Lithuania. The ideal bidder will have a strong track record of delivering projects on time and within budget, and a clear commitment to sustainable practices.
Key Requirements
Preparation of design proposals, technical project, and supervision services for a large-waste collection site.
Engineering design services for environmental documentation and project supervision.
Compliance with mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements.
Demonstrated technical capability in relevant engineering disciplines.
Adherence to Green Procurement principles.
Key Discriminators
Innovative sustainable design elements that go beyond basic compliance.
A dedicated team with specific expertise in waste management facility design and environmental impact mitigation.
A robust quality assurance and control plan for design and supervision.
A clear methodology for integrating environmental considerations throughout the project lifecycle.
Social Value Opportunities
Commitment to employing local labor for any on-site supervision or related tasks, where feasible.
Propose the use of locally sourced, sustainable materials in the design where appropriate and cost-effective.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Capability (Design & Supervision)

Provide detailed case studies of similar projects, showcasing technical expertise, innovative solutions, and successful project delivery. Emphasize the qualifications and experience of the proposed project team.

Environmental Documentation & Compliance

Clearly outline the approach to developing comprehensive environmental documentation, demonstrating a deep understanding of relevant Lithuanian and EU regulations. Highlight experience in obtaining necessary permits.

Green Procurement

Integrate specific green procurement principles into the design proposals, such as energy efficiency, waste reduction, and use of sustainable materials. Quantify the environmental benefits of proposed solutions.

Project Management & Delivery

Present a clear, detailed project plan with milestones, timelines, and resource allocation. Emphasize risk management strategies and communication protocols.

Recommendations7
Thoroughly Analyze Technical Specifications
CriticalHigh effort

Scrutinize DOCUMENT 2 (Pirkimo dokumetai) for all technical requirements related to design proposals, technical project, and supervision. Ensure all aspects of the waste collection site design are addressed.

Ensures bid compliance and demonstrates understanding of the core project needs.
Demonstrate Environmental Expertise
CriticalHigh effort

Leverage DOCUMENT 3 (Notice) to highlight experience in environmental documentation and project supervision. Detail methodologies for environmental impact assessments and compliance strategies.

Addresses a key component of the tender and builds confidence in the bidder's capabilities.
Proactively Address Green Procurement
CriticalMed effort

Since 'Green Procurement' is specified, integrate sustainable design principles and materials into the bid proposal. Quantify environmental benefits and align with the contracting authority's sustainability goals.

Provides a significant differentiator and potential scoring advantage.
Highlight Project Management Excellence
HighMed effort

Develop a robust project management plan that emphasizes efficiency, risk mitigation, and clear communication. Showcase experience in managing similar-sized infrastructure projects.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to deliver the project successfully within the 36-month duration.
Mitigate Uncertainty from Undisclosed Value
HighMed effort

Prepare a competitive pricing strategy that reflects the likely scope and complexity of the project, while remaining cost-effective. Be prepared to justify all cost elements.

Ensures the bid is both attractive and financially viable.
Formulate a Strong Technical Team Profile
MediumMed effort

Detail the qualifications and experience of the proposed project team, emphasizing their expertise in waste management, environmental engineering, and project supervision.

Directly addresses technical capability requirements and builds credibility.
Incorporate Local Employment Commitment
LowLow effort

If feasible, include a commitment to utilizing local labor for aspects of the project, aligning with potential broader public sector social value objectives.

May provide a marginal advantage if the contracting authority implicitly values local economic contribution.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as a comprehensive, integrated solution that addresses all aspects of the tender (design, technical project, supervision, and environmental documentation) with a strong emphasis on sustainability.
Highlight a proven track record of successful project delivery in Lithuania, demonstrating familiarity with local regulations and operating environments.
Emphasize a proactive and collaborative approach to working with the contracting authority, ensuring transparency and efficient communication throughout the project lifecycle.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

NoticePDF
Notice_7110392.pdf

This document is a tender notice for engineering design services for project management, technical documentation, and environmental document preparation in Zarasai, Lithuania.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_7110392_1.xml

This document outlines the tender structure for procurement services related to project execution supervision and environmental document preparation in Zarasai district, specifying evaluation criteria for technical and financial proposals.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for engineering design services is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a standard open procedure. However, the lack of disclosed evaluation criteria and estimated value, along with a potentially short submission deadline, are notable concerns.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender follows an open procedure compliant with EU directives (2014/24/ES). CPV code is specified, and the organization is identified. The absence of disputes and suspensions contributes positively. However, the missing reveal date and unspecified evaluation criteria could pose minor compliance risks.

Missing reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are reasonably clear, outlining the scope of engineering design services. Technical specifications are provided in a dedicated document. The conditions for participation are generally outlined, though specific evaluation criteria are missing.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, reference number, contract duration, and CPV code. Three tender documents are available, with summaries provided for key ones. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the submission deadline might be considered short.

Estimated value not disclosed
Submission deadline may be too short
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes an open procedure and e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The value is not disclosed, which is a drawback for fairness. However, there are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, and the criteria, once clarified, are expected to be objective.

Estimated value not disclosed
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as e-procurement, which is positive. However, the specific e-submission mechanism is not explicitly detailed. The contract start date is not provided, and financing information is absent. The duration is specified.

No e-submission details
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and CPV code are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The tender status is active.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'EU Funded' and 'E-Procurement' as characteristics. However, there is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear open procedure and EU compliance
Well-defined CPV code and project scope
Availability of tender documents with summaries
E-procurement enabled

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Potentially short submission deadline
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated contract value to enhance transparency.
2. Specify the evaluation criteria clearly to ensure a fair and objective selection process.
3. Consider extending the submission deadline if it is deemed too short for bidders to prepare comprehensive proposals.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline