Skip to main content
Tenders

Palace renovation works at Prezidento g. 7, Tauragė (announced tender)

Open
Deadline
3 days left
March 31, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7104465
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Taurage County, Lithuania
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 31, 2026

Tender Opening

March 31, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
5 months
Location
Taurage County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€6,132,447
Avg. Bids
4.1
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
90%
960 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The exact description is provided in the simple renovation works description - technical specification.
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

13 documents available with AI summaries

0. PD_Bendrosios_salygos.docxDOC
0. PD_Bendrosios_salygos.docx -- 68.3 KB

No content extracted

0. PD_Specialiosios_salygos.docxDOC
0. PD_Specialiosios_salygos.docx -- 47.3 KB

No content extracted

1 priedas. Darb╓ apra╒as ir technin╙ specifikacija.docxDOC
1 priedas. Darb╓ apra╒as ir technin╙ specifik... -- 46.7 KB

No content extracted

2 priedas Pasi╫lymo forma.docxDOC
2 priedas Pasi╫lymo forma.docx -- 22.0 KB

No content extracted

2_priedo_Pasiulymo_forma_1priedas_jei taikoma_ Deklaracija_del_sutikimo_buti_sub...DOC
2_priedo_Pasiulymo_forma_1priedas_jei taikoma... -- 30.9 KB

No content extracted

3 priedas_Sutarties projektas.docxDOC
3 priedas_Sutarties projektas.docx -- 54.1 KB

No content extracted

4_priedas_TD_d╙l atitikimo nacionalinio saugumo reikal.docxDOC
4_priedas_TD_d╙l atitikimo nacionalinio saugu... -- 34.4 KB

No content extracted

6 priedas_deklaracija nuo 2025-02-01.docxDOC
6 priedas_deklaracija nuo 2025-02-01.docx -- 19.2 KB

No content extracted

Dėl PVMDOC
Klausimas2.docx

This document clarifies that all funds in procurements are indicated without VAT, as specified in the technical specification for ordinary repair works.

NoticePDF
Notice_7104465.pdf

This document is a tender notice for renovation works of hospital rooms at Prezidento g. 7, Tauragė, Lithuania.

2 aukšto planas su patalpų numeravimu ir kvadratūraPDF
Planas 2 a_.pdf

No content extracted

7 priedas. KIEKIAI.╪iniara╒tis.xlsxXLS
7 priedas. KIEKIAI.╪iniara╒tis.xlsx -- 15.4 KB

No content extracted

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_7104465_1.xml

This document outlines the structure of a complete tender for an open procedure, specifying a single lot and the lowest price evaluation criterion, requiring a mandatory file submission.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for hospital ward renovation is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and financial details. The short submission deadline is a concern.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure rules and includes a proper CPV code. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline appears short. No disputes are indicated. Regulatory compliance is assumed given the EU funding.

Submission deadline may be too short
Clarity80/100

The tender provides a clear title and references a technical specification for detailed requirements. The AI-extracted requirements list is helpful. However, evaluation criteria are missing, impacting clarity on how bids will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, reference, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. The majority of attached documents are in an unknown format or have no extracted content, hindering a full assessment of completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Limited content extracted from attached documents
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure with EU funding, suggesting a fair process. E-procurement is indicated. Criteria are not explicitly stated, but the absence of company-specific requirements suggests a degree of fairness. Full document access is assumed through the platform.

Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as E-Procurement, which is positive. However, the AI-extracted issues mention 'No e-submission', which contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic. The contract start date is not specified, and financing information is limited to 'EU Funded'.

Contradiction regarding e-submission
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and CPV are populated. Dates are logical, with an opening date following the submission deadline. No suspension or disputes are reported, indicating good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Proper CPV code provided
EU Funded status indicated
Open procedure with e-procurement

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Short submission deadline
Limited content extracted from attached documents

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated contract value.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria.
3. Review and potentially extend the submission deadline.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline