Skip to main content
Tenders

Cultural purpose building with underground parking – Kaunas M. K. Čiurlionis Concert Center

Open
Deadline
12 days left
April 08, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7103434
Value
€32,197
Location
Kaunas County, Lithuania
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 01, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 08, 2026

Tender Opening

April 08, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€32,197
Duration
60 months
Location
Kaunas County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€131,412
Avg. Bids
3.9
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
98%
2,076 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Procurement of a cultural purpose building with underground parking – Kaunas M. K. Čiurlionis Concert Center
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[Specific submission requirements will be detailed in the tender documents]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[Specific requirements for exclusion grounds will be detailed in the tender documents]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Specific eligibility requirements will be detailed in the tender documents]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Specific technical capability requirements will be detailed in the tender documents]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[Specific financial requirements will be detailed in the tender documents]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

Atviro konkurso bendrosios sąlygos.docxDOC
Atviro konkurso bendrosios sąlygos.docx -- 111.2 KB

No content extracted

Atviro konkurso specialiosios sąlygos (Čiurlionio koncertų centro projekto priež...DOC
Atviro konkurso specialiosios sąlygos (Čiurli... -- 86.5 KB

No content extracted

7 priedas. Sutarties projektas.pdfPDF
7 priedas. Sutarties projektas.pdf -- 1.1 MB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_7103434.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the procurement of technical project supervision services for a cultural building with underground parking in Kaunas, Lithuania.

3 priedas. EBVPD.xmlXML
3 priedas. EBVPD.xml -- 139.9 KB

This document contains the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) form, which bidders must fill out and submit.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_7103434_1.xml

This document outlines the structure for a complete tender submission, including a mandatory file upload, for the procurement of a cultural building with underground parking in Kaunas.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for cultural building project supervision is generally well-structured with clear documentation and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on sustainability aspects.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure (2014/24/ES) and provides a CPV code. Deadlines are specified, and the contract duration is reasonable. No disputes are noted. The procedure is clear, but the absence of explicit regulatory compliance details in the provided text limits a higher score.

Clarity80/100

The title and description are clear, and the purpose of the procurement is well-defined. The availability of multiple documents (ESPD, general and special conditions, contract draft) contributes to clarity. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria is a significant omission.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are present. Contract duration and tender validity are specified. Six documents are attached, including the ESPD template and contract draft. However, the content summary for the contract draft is missing, and specific exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements are not detailed within the provided text.

No specific exclusion grounds listed
No specific eligibility requirements listed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, promoting broad participation. The estimated value is disclosed. Deadlines are provided, and the use of e-procurement is indicated. The criteria for evaluation are not specified, which could be a concern for fairness if not detailed in the attached documents. No requirements appear tailored to specific companies.

Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. A contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, but the contract duration is given. Financing information is not detailed. The submission deadline is provided. The availability of document URLs is not confirmed in the provided text.

Financing information not detailed
Contract start date not explicitly mentioned
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logical. The tender is active and has a specified validity period. The opening date is shortly after the submission deadline, which is standard.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender details. The tender is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

No green procurement mentioned
No social aspects mentioned

Strengths

Clear title and description
Open procedure with e-procurement
Disclosure of estimated value
Availability of multiple tender documents

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of specific eligibility/capability requirements in provided text
Absence of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Specify evaluation criteria clearly within the tender documents.
2. Detail any specific exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements.
3. Incorporate sustainability aspects (green, social, innovation) into the tender.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline