Cadastral surveying of local roads, streets, and flat structures, cadastral surveying

This tender for cadastral surveying services in Trakai district is generally well-structured but lacks explicit details on exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements, impacting completeness and clarity. The e-procurement characteristic is positive for fairness and practicality.

The tender adheres to open procedure (2014/24/ES) and uses a proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the submission date. No disputes are noted. The primary concern is the lack of explicit information regarding mandatory exclusion grounds, which could be a regulatory oversight.

The core service is clearly described, and the presence of tender documents (Notice, Conditions, and a list of roads) aids understanding. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed requirements for eligibility, technical capability, and financial standing creates ambiguity.

Basic information like title, organization, value, and duration is present. However, critical sections for mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical capability, and financial requirements are entirely missing, significantly reducing the completeness of the tender documentation.

The tender is advertised as an open procedure and utilizes e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The value is disclosed, and the deadline, while potentially short, is not excessively so. The lack of specified evaluation criteria is a concern for objective assessment, but there are no clear indications of tailoring to specific companies.

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting an electronic submission process. The contract duration and estimated value are provided. However, the absence of a contract start date and financing information limits practical planning for potential bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. The dates provided (submission, opening) are logical. The primary inconsistency is the presence of 'E-Procurement' as a characteristic while the 'Issues' list mentions 'No e-submission', which needs clarification.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.