Skip to main content
Tenders

Ultrasound surgical instrument BoneScalpel ultrasound working handpiece (11708) (simplified

Open
Deadline
13 days left
April 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7090752
Value
€5,830
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 09, 2026

Tender Opening

April 09, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€5,830
Duration
7 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€50,148
Avg. Bids
7.2
Competition
High
SME Winners
99%
54,649 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Requirements for the subject of procurement are set out in the procurement documents.
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

10 documents available with AI summaries

SPS_4 priedas_pasiulymo forma (11708).docDOC
SPS_4 priedas_pasiulymo forma (11708).doc -- 59.0 KB

No content extracted

BPS_SAK nuo 2025-02-01.docxDOC
BPS_SAK nuo 2025-02-01.docx -- 77.4 KB

No content extracted

Specialiosios pirkimo s╨lygos_BoneScalpel ultragarsin╙ darbin╙ rankena (11708).d...DOC
Specialiosios pirkimo s╨lygos_BoneScalpel ult... -- 26.9 KB

No content extracted

SPS 1 priedas_Technine_specifikacija.docxDOC
SPS 1 priedas_Technine_specifikacija.docx -- 18.8 KB

No content extracted

SPS 2 priedas_Sutarties projektas 03.25 (11708).docxDOC
SPS 2 priedas_Sutarties projektas 03.25 (1170... -- 96.9 KB

No content extracted

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 92.5 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_7090752.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the procurement of ultrasound surgical apparatus BoneScalpel ultrasonic working handle (11708) by Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics in Lithuania.

README.txtTXT
README.txt -- 835 B

This document contains a package of documents, including a file named BPS_SAK, with a specified version and effective date.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_7090752_1.xml

This document contains the complete tender structure for Cycle 1, including a mandatory file submission for evaluation.

espd-request.xmlXML
espd-request.xml -- 139.7 KB

This document contains a request for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), which is a self-declaration form used in public procurement procedures.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for an ultrasonic surgical device handle is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and available documentation. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on green or social aspects.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to the open procedure (2014/24/ES) and provides a CPV code. Deadlines are specified, though the submission deadline might be considered short. No disputes are noted. The procedure is clear.

Clarity80/100

The description states that requirements are detailed in the procurement documents, which are available. The AI-extracted requirements list general categories. The main issue is the absence of specified evaluation criteria.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and deadlines. Ten tender documents are listed, though their content summaries are often missing or indicate extraction issues. The AI-extracted requirements are generic.

Content summaries for several documents are missing or indicate extraction issues.
AI-extracted requirements are generic.
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and the value is disclosed. E-procurement is indicated. There are no immediately apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. The availability of documents is a positive aspect.

Practicality65/100

E-procurement is mentioned, but the specific e-submission mechanism is not detailed. The contract start date is not explicitly stated, and financing information is absent. The contract duration is provided.

Lack of explicit e-submission details.
Contract start date not specified.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The tender status is 'active'.

Sustainability50/100

There is no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is not explicitly EU funded.

No green procurement criteria.
No social criteria.

Strengths

Clear basic information (title, reference, organization, value, deadlines).
Open procedure with CPV code provided.
Ten tender documents are available.
E-procurement indicated.

Concerns

Missing specific evaluation criteria.
Lack of detail on e-submission process.
Absence of sustainability (green, social, innovation) aspects.
Potential for short submission deadline.
Issues with document content extraction.

Recommendations

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria within the tender documents.
2. Provide detailed instructions for the e-submission process.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability criteria to align with modern procurement practices.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline