Reconstruction of state-owned land reclamation structures in Šilalė district project

This tender for engineering design services is generally well-structured but lacks crucial details regarding evaluation criteria and financial aspects, impacting overall transparency and completeness.

The tender adheres to general procurement principles with a clear procedure and CPV code. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and potential issues with deadline reasonableness (given the short timeframe for a complex project) slightly reduce its score.

The description of the required services is clear, and the tender documents are available. However, the lack of specified eligibility, technical, and financial requirements leaves significant ambiguity for potential bidders.

Basic information like title, reference, organization, and CPV code is present. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial requirements (eligibility, technical, financial, submission) are missing, significantly impacting completeness.

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The absence of tailored requirements for specific companies is positive. However, the undisclosed value and missing evaluation criteria hinder full transparency and objective assessment.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the lack of explicit information on contract start date, financing details, and the absence of a clear e-submission process (beyond the general e-procurement characteristic) limit its practicality.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and CPV code are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The main inconsistency lies in the missing financial information and evaluation criteria.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender documents. The absence of these elements results in a low score for sustainability.