Accommodation Services in Trakai for the 2026 Rowing Season (Open Tender)

This tender for accommodation services in Trakai is generally well-structured with clear documentation, though it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on green/social aspects. The short submission deadline is a minor concern.

The tender adheres to Lithuanian public procurement law and uses the correct EU directive code. The CPV code is broad but acceptable for the service type. No disputes are reported. The primary concern is the potentially short submission deadline, which could impact legal compliance if it's deemed unreasonable.

The tender provides a clear title, description, and attached documents that outline the service and contract. The draft contract and invitation are provided, offering good insight into expectations. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity for bidders.

Most basic information is present, including the estimated value, contract duration, and organization. Five relevant documents are attached, covering the contract draft, invitation, and proposal template. The main gap is the lack of detailed requirements for eligibility, technical capability, and financial standing.

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting transparency. The estimated value is disclosed, and the procedure is open. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, suggesting a fair process. The lack of detailed evaluation criteria could be a minor point of concern for fairness.

The tender is active and uses e-procurement, which is positive. However, the AI-extracted requirements indicate a lack of explicit mention of e-submission functionality beyond the general 'e-procurement' characteristic, and no specific contract start date is provided. Financing information is also absent.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The dates provided (submission and opening) are logical. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The data appears consistent and reliable.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU-funded. This area is underdeveloped.