Skip to main content
Tenders

Vacuum Flow Regulators

Open
Deadline
14 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7083445
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Klaipeda County, Lithuania
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Tender Opening

April 10, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
19 months
Location
Klaipeda County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€207,877
Avg. Bids
2.6
Competition
Low
SME Winners
96%
487 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Vacuum flow regulators.
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

1DOC
Bendrosios sąlygos.docx

This document contains definitions of terms and abbreviations used in the tender for vacuum flow regulators, along with general provisions regarding the procurement process.

4DOC
Supaprastintas SPECIALIOSIOS sąlygos.docx

This document contains tender specifications for the procurement of vacuum flow regulators by VšĮ Klaipėdos universiteto ligoninė, outlining technical requirements, submission procedures, and required documentation.

5DOC
Viešojo_pirkimo-pardavimo_sutarties_projektas...

This document contains the general terms and conditions for a goods purchase and sale agreement, outlining definitions, interpretation rules, and document hierarchy for the procurement of vacuum flow regulators.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 73.1 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_7083445.pdf

This document is a tender notice for the procurement of vacuum flow regulators, which are vacuum pump parts, by Klaipėda University Hospital in Lithuania.

README.txtTXT
README.txt -- 835 B

This document contains a corrupted file named 'espd-request.xml' and 'espd-request.pdf', likely related to a tender for vacuum flow regulators.

3XLS
Pasiulymo_forma.xlsx

This document contains a proposal form for vacuum flow regulators for Klaipėda University Hospital.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_7083445_1.xml

This document contains the structure for a complete tender submission for vacuum flow regulators, requiring a mandatory file upload.

espd-request.xmlXML
espd-request.xml -- 99.0 KB

This document is a request for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) related to vacuum flow regulators.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for vacuum flow regulators is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and adherence to EU procurement standards. However, the lack of disclosed value and specific evaluation criteria slightly impacts completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender follows the open procedure (2014/24/ES) and utilizes the correct CPV code. Deadlines are provided, and the organization is a public entity. No disputes are indicated. The procedure is clear, but the absence of a reveal date is a minor oversight.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The description of the goods is concise. Key documents like the contract notice, technical specifications, and proposal forms are available. The ESPD request is also provided. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, title, reference, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for potential bidders. The submission deadline and opening date are clear.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is open and uses e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The ESPD request ensures a standardized eligibility process. The lack of disclosed value is a concern for fairness, as it prevents bidders from fully assessing the opportunity. No specific company tailoring is evident.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as e-procurement, which is positive. However, the AI analysis indicates 'No e-submission', which is a contradiction and needs clarification. The contract duration is specified. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

No e-submission (contradictory to e-procurement characteristic)
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and CPV code are populated. Dates for submission and opening are logical. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The contract duration is consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as EU Funded, which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear EU procurement procedure (2014/24/ES)
Availability of key tender documents (Notice, ESPD, Technical Specs)
E-procurement characteristic indicated
Consistent data for key fields

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing specific evaluation criteria
Potential contradiction regarding e-submission

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated contract value to ensure full transparency and fairness.
2. Specify the evaluation criteria to provide bidders with a clear understanding of how proposals will be assessed.
3. Clarify the e-submission process to resolve the contradiction with the e-procurement characteristic.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline