Skip to main content
Tenders

Facade (wall) insulation works of the administrative building, Kęstučio a. 3, Ukmergė, masonry

Open
Deadline
6 days left
April 03, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7082873
Value
€53,719
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 03, 2026

Tender Opening

April 03, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€53,719
Duration
6 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€6,132,447
Avg. Bids
4.1
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
90%
960 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The Administration of Ukmergė District Municipality (hereinafter - the Contracting Authority) intends to procure
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Skelbiamos apklausos pirkimo sąlygosDOC
Administracinio pastato rekonstravimo darbų p...

This document contains the procurement conditions for a low-value open tender for the insulation of administrative building facades, installation of a masonry partition, and replacement of attic roofing in Ukmergė.

6 priedas - Viešojo pirkimo sutarties projektasDOC
Pirkimo sąlygų 6 priedas (Sutarties projektas...

This document contains the draft public procurement contract for facade insulation, partition installation, and roof covering replacement works for an administrative building in Ukmergė.

NoticePDF
Notice_7082873.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for facade insulation, partition wall installation, and attic roof covering replacement works for an administrative building in Ukmergė, Lithuania.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_7082873_1.xml

This document outlines the structure of a simplified open tender for the Ukmergė Municipality Administration, focusing on the complete tender submission requirements.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for facade insulation works in Ukmergė is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on sustainability aspects.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight by some. No disputes are indicated. The procedure is open, suggesting a fair process.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and essential documents like the technical project and contract draft are provided. The requirements are documented, but specific evaluation criteria are missing, which could impact clarity for bidders.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the estimated value, contract duration, and tender validity. Five documents are attached, providing technical details and contract conditions. However, the absence of explicit eligibility, technical capability, financial, and submission requirements in the AI-extracted section suggests these might be detailed within the attached documents, impacting the perceived completeness of the tender notice itself.

AI-extracted requirements section is largely empty, implying details are solely within attached documents.
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and the estimated value is disclosed. The use of e-procurement is a positive indicator of fairness. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. The criteria for evaluation are not explicitly stated, which could be a concern for transparency.

Evaluation criteria not specified
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is practical. A contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, and financing information is absent. While documents are available, the lack of explicit mention of e-submission within the AI-extracted requirements is noted, though the 'Characteristics: E-Procurement' suggests it is the intended method.

Contract start date not explicitly mentioned
Financing information not provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided (submission, opening, validity) are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of works
Disclosure of estimated value
Use of e-procurement
Availability of key tender documents (technical project, contract draft)
Proper CPV code provided

Concerns

Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Lack of specified sustainability aspects (green, social, innovation)
Contract start date and financing information not explicitly provided
AI-extracted requirements section is sparse

Recommendations

1. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria.
2. Incorporate and specify sustainability requirements (e.g., environmental considerations, social impact) if applicable.
3. Provide clarity on the contract start date and financing arrangements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline