Skip to main content
Tenders

Furniture

Open
Deadline
17 days left
April 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7082677
Value
€41,322
Location
Panevezys County, Lithuania
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 13, 2026

Tender Opening

April 13, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€41,322
Duration
9 months
Location
Panevezys County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€69,654
Avg. Bids
3.6
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
98%
1,750 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Furniture
EU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

BaldaiDOC
BALDAI kvietimas.docx

This document is an invitation to participate in a price inquiry for furniture, outlining the procurement object, procedures, evaluation criteria, and contract conditions by the Lithuanian Army's King Mindaugas Hussar Battalion.

Baldų vizualizacijos ir specifikacijosDOC
Vizualizacijos patalpų.docx

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_7082677.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the procurement of furniture by the Lithuanian Army's King Mindaugas Hussar Battalion, with a deadline for submissions on April 13, 2026.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_7082677_1.xml

This document outlines the structure of a simplified open tender for furniture, specifying a single lot and evaluation based on the lowest price, requiring a complete tender file submission.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for furniture is generally well-structured with clear basic information and EU funding noted. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and submission requirements, impacting clarity and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and indication of EU funding. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered short. No disputes are noted. The procedure is open, which is standard.

Clarity80/100

The title and description are very basic ('Baldai' - Furniture). While the CPV code is present, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed submission requirements significantly reduces clarity. The tender documents provide some context but lack granular detail on what is expected from bidders.

Missing evaluation criteria
Vague description of requirements
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the estimated value, contract duration, and deadlines. Three tender documents are attached. However, the lack of detailed requirements for eligibility, technical, financial, and submission aspects means crucial information for bidders is missing.

Missing detailed eligibility requirements
Missing detailed technical capability requirements
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and the value is disclosed. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect for fairness. There are no immediately apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. The main concern is the lack of specified objective criteria for evaluation, which could lead to perceived unfairness.

No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting an electronic submission process. However, the 'Issues' section explicitly states 'No e-submission', creating a contradiction. The contract start date is not specified, and financing information is limited to 'EU Funded'. The lack of detailed requirements also impacts practicality for bidders.

Contradiction regarding e-submission
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The dates provided (submission and opening) are logical. There are no noted disputes or suspensions. The CPV code is appropriate for the title.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'EU Funded', which often implies adherence to certain EU standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information. This category is therefore rated moderately.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear basic information (title, reference, organization, value)
Proper CPV code provided
Indication of EU Funding
Open procedure and e-procurement noted

Concerns

Missing detailed evaluation criteria
Vague and incomplete requirements (eligibility, technical, financial, submission)
Potential contradiction regarding e-submission process
Short submission deadline

Recommendations

1. Specify detailed evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
2. Provide comprehensive requirements for eligibility, technical, financial, and submission aspects.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and ensure it is clearly indicated.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline