Skip to main content
Tenders

Projectors for SUA auditoriums (announcement of inquiry)

Open
Deadline
4 days left
March 31, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7079313
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 31, 2026

Tender Opening

March 31, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
3 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€136,921
Avg. Bids
2.6
Competition
Low
SME Winners
100%
1,192 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Projectors for SUA auditoriums (announcement of inquiry)
EU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

11 documents available with AI summaries

Pirkimo s╨lyg╓ priedas Nr. 1 Technin╙ specifikacija_III OBJEKTO DALIS.docxDOC
Pirkimo s╨lyg╓ priedas Nr. 1 Technin╙ specifi... -- 22.6 KB

No content extracted

Pirkimo s╨lyg╓ priedas Nr. 1 Technin╙ specifikacija_II OBJEKTO DALIS.docxDOC
Pirkimo s╨lyg╓ priedas Nr. 1 Technin╙ specifi... -- 21.0 KB

No content extracted

Pirkimo s╨lyg╓ priedas Nr. 1 Technin╙ specifikacija_I OBJEKTO DALIS.docxDOC
Pirkimo s╨lyg╓ priedas Nr. 1 Technin╙ specifi... -- 21.1 KB

No content extracted

Pirkimo s╨lyg╓ priedas Nr. 2 Pasi╫lymo forma.docxDOC
Pirkimo s╨lyg╓ priedas Nr. 2 Pasi╫lymo forma.... -- 23.2 KB

No content extracted

Pirkimo s╨lyg╓ priedas Nr. 3 Pasi╫lym╓ vertinimo kriterijai.docxDOC
Pirkimo s╨lyg╓ priedas Nr. 3 Pasi╫lym╓ vertin... -- 14.3 KB

No content extracted

Pirkimo s╨lyg╓ priedas Nr. 4 Preki╓ pirkimo-pardavimo sutarties specialiosios s╨...DOC
Pirkimo s╨lyg╓ priedas Nr. 4 Preki╓ pirkimo-p... -- 32.4 KB

No content extracted

Pirkimo s╨lyg╓ priedas Nr. 5 Preki╓ pirkimo-pardavimo sutarties bendrosios s╨lyg...DOC
Pirkimo s╨lyg╓ priedas Nr. 5 Preki╓ pirkimo-p... -- 65.3 KB

No content extracted

Skelbiamos apklausos bendrosios s╨lygos.docxDOC
Skelbiamos apklausos bendrosios s╨lygos.docx -- 112.1 KB

No content extracted

Skelbiamos apklausos specialiosios s╨lygos.docxDOC
Skelbiamos apklausos specialiosios s╨lygos.do... -- 81.6 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_7079313.pdf

This document contains a tender notice from Mykolo Romeris University for the procurement of projectors for auditoriums in Lithuania.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_7079313_1.xml

This document contains the tender structure for a simplified open procedure for projectors for auditoriums, requiring a complete tender submission.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for projectors is active and EU-funded, with a clear CPV code and NUTS code. However, it lacks disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria, impacting completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, indicated by the EU funding and open procedure type. The CPV and NUTS codes are provided. However, the absence of a disclosed estimated value and the short submission deadline could raise concerns regarding procedural fairness and regulatory adherence in some jurisdictions.

Submission deadline may be too short
Value not disclosed
Clarity80/100

The title and description are clear, and the CPV code is specified. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria and detailed requirements within the provided document summaries makes it difficult for potential bidders to fully understand the assessment process.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Key information such as the title, reference, organization, and CPV code are present. The contract duration is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the AI-extracted requirements section indicates that crucial details like exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are missing from the direct tender text, suggesting they are buried within the attached documents.

Estimated value not disclosed
AI-extracted requirements section is empty, implying details are within attached documents
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure and is EU-funded, suggesting a degree of fairness. The use of e-procurement is noted. However, the undisclosed estimated value and the absence of clearly stated evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent, potentially impacting the fairness of the competition.

Value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', which is positive. However, the AI-extracted requirements do not explicitly confirm e-submission details. The contract duration is short (3 months), and financing information is not disclosed, which could affect planning for bidders.

No e-submission details explicitly confirmed in AI extraction
Financing information not disclosed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, CPV, and submission deadline are populated. The tender status is 'active'. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of an active tender.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information, suggesting these are not primary considerations for this procurement.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear CPV and NUTS codes
EU Funded and E-Procurement indicated
Active status with logical dates
Multiple relevant documents attached

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Short submission deadline
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the procurement.
2. Clearly outline the evaluation criteria within the tender notice or accessible documents.
3. Consider extending the submission deadline to allow for more comprehensive bidder participation.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline