Skip to main content
Tenders

Custom-made furniture (simplified procurement)

Open
Deadline
7 days left
April 03, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7075768
Value
€54,466
Location
Marijampole County, Lithuania
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 03, 2026

Tender Opening

April 03, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€54,466
Duration
3 months
Location
Marijampole County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€69,654
Avg. Bids
3.6
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
98%
1,750 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Purchase of custom-made furniture, 45 pcs.
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information provided
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information provided
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information provided
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information provided
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information provided

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

NoticePDF
Notice_7075768.pdf

This document is a tender notice for the procurement of 45 custom-made furniture items by Mykolas Romeris University in Lithuania.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_7075768_1.xml

This document contains the structure for an open tender procedure for custom-made furniture, evaluated on the lowest price, with a mandatory file submission.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for custom-made furniture is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and EU funding noted. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and detailed requirements, impacting its completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender follows an open procedure (2014/24/ES) and has a clear CPV code. While no disputes are reported, the absence of specified evaluation criteria could lead to procedural ambiguity. The deadline is active and appears reasonable for a simplified procurement.

Clarity80/100

The description of the procurement (45 custom-made furniture items) is concise. However, the lack of documented technical, financial, and eligibility requirements, as well as specified evaluation criteria, reduces overall clarity for potential bidders.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the estimated value, duration, and CPV code. However, the absence of detailed requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial) and evaluation criteria means the tender is not fully complete for bidders to prepare a comprehensive submission.

Missing evaluation criteria
No specific exclusion grounds listed
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and the value is disclosed, promoting transparency. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect. The lack of specific, detailed requirements means criteria are not tailored to specific companies, which is good for fairness. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria could be a concern.

Practicality65/100

The tender is active and EU-funded, with e-procurement indicated. However, the lack of explicit e-submission details and the absence of specific requirements in the provided documents make practical preparation challenging. The contract duration is short.

No e-submission details provided
Missing specific requirements in documents
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadline are populated. No disputes or suspensions are noted, and the dates appear logical. The tender status is active.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is EU funded, which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear basic information and title
EU Funded and E-Procurement indicated
Disclosed estimated value and duration
Active status with no disputes

Concerns

Missing specific evaluation criteria
Lack of detailed requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial)
Absence of explicit green, social, or innovation aspects

Recommendations

1. Specify detailed evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
2. Provide comprehensive documentation for exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability criteria to align with modern procurement practices.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline