Skip to main content
Tenders

Pedestrian Pavement Repair Works at Mokolų St. 13 Apartment Building, Marijampolė

Open
Deadline
5 days left
April 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7075155
Value
€49,367
Location
Marijampole County, Lithuania
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 02, 2026

Tender Opening

April 02, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€49,367
Duration
8 months
Location
Marijampole County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€6,132,447
Avg. Bids
4.1
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
90%
960 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The Administration of Marijampolė Municipality, carrying out this low-value public procurement, intends to...
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the tender document]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the tender document]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the tender document]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the tender document]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the tender document]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

Pirkimo sąlygosDOC
Pirkimo sąlygos.docx

This document contains the tender conditions for the procurement of simple renovation works for pedestrian surfaces near Mokolų g. 13, Marijampolė, including various appendices such as the offer form and contract draft.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 78.1 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_7075155.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the simple repair works of pedestrian surfaces near a residential building at Mokolų g. 13, Marijampolė, Lithuania.

README.txtTXT
README.txt -- 835 B

This document contains a corrupted ESPD request file, likely related to a public procurement process by the Marijampolė Municipality Administration.

Darbų kiekių žiniaraštisXLS
Žiniaraštis.xlsx

This document contains a bill of quantities for construction works, detailing various tasks, units of measurement, and quantities.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_7075155_1.xml

This document contains the structure for a complete tender submission, including a mandatory file upload, for a simplified open procurement procedure.

espd-request.xmlXML
espd-request.xml -- 217.9 KB

This document contains a request for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) in an XML format, likely for a public procurement process in Lithuania.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for pedestrian path repair works in Marijampolė is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on sustainability aspects.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and a clear procedure for a small-value procurement. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered short by some. No disputes are indicated.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the tender documents provide necessary details such as the bill of quantities and tender conditions. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria introduces ambiguity for bidders.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the estimated value, contract duration, and submission deadline. Seven tender documents are available, including essential ones like the bill of quantities and tender conditions. However, the lack of explicit mandatory exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements within the AI-extracted section suggests these might be detailed solely within the provided documents, impacting perceived completeness.

AI-extracted requirements section is empty, implying details are solely within documents.
Fairness85/100

The tender is open and uses e-procurement, promoting fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria for evaluation, while not explicitly listed in the summary, are expected to be within the provided 'Pirkimo sąlygos' document. No requirements appear tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the AI-extracted information does not explicitly confirm e-submission capabilities or provide a direct URL for documents, and financing information is not detailed. The contract start date is also not specified.

No explicit confirmation of e-submission capability in AI extraction.
No direct URL for documents provided in AI extraction.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference number, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. The tender status is active, and no disputes or suspensions are indicated, ensuring logical consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on these broader sustainability goals.

No green procurement criteria.
No social aspects mentioned.

Strengths

Clear description of works and location.
Use of e-procurement.
Disclosure of estimated value and contract duration.
Availability of essential tender documents (BoQ, conditions).

Concerns

Missing explicit evaluation criteria.
Lack of detail on sustainability aspects (green, social, innovation).
Potential for short submission deadline.

Recommendations

1. Clearly state evaluation criteria within the tender notice or summary.
2. Incorporate sustainability considerations into future tenders.
3. Ensure submission deadlines are adequately reasonable for potential bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline