Skip to main content
Tenders

Automation works of auxiliary equipment at Gargždai boiler house No. 4

Open
Deadline
18 days left
April 14, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7068061
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Klaipeda County, Lithuania
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 07, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 14, 2026

Tender Opening

April 14, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
9 months
Location
Klaipeda County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€6,132,447
Avg. Bids
4.1
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
90%
960 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Automation works of auxiliary equipment at Gargždai boiler house No. 4
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No requirements provided.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No requirements provided.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No requirements provided.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No requirements provided.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No requirements provided.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

11 documents available with AI summaries

2 PRIEDAS Techninė specifikacija.docxDOC
2 PRIEDAS Techninė specifikacija.docx -- 102.8 KB

No content extracted

5 PRIEDAS Pasiūlymo forma.docxDOC
5 PRIEDAS Pasiūlymo forma.docx -- 31.9 KB

No content extracted

6 PRIEDAS Sutarties projektas.docxDOC
6 PRIEDAS Sutarties projektas.docx -- 94.6 KB

No content extracted

7 PRIEDAS Tiekėjų kvalifikacijos ir ISO standartų reikalavimai.docxDOC
7 PRIEDAS Tiekėjų kvalifikacijos ir ISO stand... -- 23.9 KB

No content extracted

8 PRIEDAS Nacionalinio saugumo atitikties deklaracija.docxDOC
8 PRIEDAS Nacionalinio saugumo atitikties dek... -- 22.0 KB

No content extracted

Bendrosios pirkimo sąlygos.docxDOC
Bendrosios pirkimo sąlygos.docx -- 122.8 KB

No content extracted

Specialiosios pirkimo sąlygos.docxDOC
Specialiosios pirkimo sąlygos.docx -- 61.2 KB

No content extracted

Techninės specifikacijos priedas.docxDOC
Techninės specifikacijos priedas.docx -- 2.2 MB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_7068061.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the automation works of auxiliary equipment at Gargždų boiler house No. 4 in Lithuania.

4 PRIEDAS EBVPD.xmlXML
4 PRIEDAS EBVPD.xml -- 102.5 KB

This document contains the form for submitting a bid proposal for the automation works of auxiliary equipment at Gargždai boiler house No. 4.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_7068061_1.xml

This document contains the complete tender structure for the automation works of auxiliary equipment at Gargždų katilinės Nr. 4, including a mandatory file submission.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for automation works at Gargždų katilinė Nr. 4 is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a defined process. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria presents minor concerns.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and an open procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of an open tender. No disputes are indicated. The legal form of the organization is specified.

Clarity80/100

The title and description of the works are clear. While specific requirements are not fully detailed in the extracted AI-generated section, the presence of numerous attached documents (including technical specifications and contract drafts) suggests that detailed requirements are available within the tender package.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, reference number, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which impacts completeness. The availability of 11 documents, including technical specifications and proposal forms, indicates a good level of detail is provided.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting transparency. The criteria for evaluation are not explicitly stated in the provided summary, which could be a concern for fairness. However, the absence of requirements tailored to specific companies is positive.

Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the AI-extracted requirements section indicates 'No e-submission' and 'No information provided' for submission requirements, which contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic. The contract start date is not specified.

Contradiction regarding e-submission
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and contract duration are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The CPV code is provided.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding in the provided information. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

No explicit sustainability criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear title and description of works
Comprehensive set of tender documents available
E-procurement utilized
Proper CPV code provided

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Evaluation criteria not specified
Potential contradiction regarding e-submission

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly outline the evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and ensure it aligns with the e-procurement characteristic.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline