Preparation of an emergency removal project for Vilniaus St. 13, Kaunas

This tender for engineering design services is generally well-structured with clear basic information and available documents. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on technical and financial capabilities, impacting its overall completeness and fairness.

The tender adheres to general EU procurement directives (2014/24/ES) and uses a proper CPV code. Deadlines are provided, and the procedure is open. No disputes are indicated. The legal form of the organization is specified. The primary concern is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which is a key component of legal compliance in procurement.

The tender title and description are clear, outlining the object as the preparation of an emergency condition removal project. Key information such as estimated value, duration, and submission deadline are present. The CPV code is also clearly stated. The main area for improvement is the lack of detailed requirements for exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial capabilities.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. Four tender documents are available, providing some level of detail. However, the absence of specific requirements for exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical capability, and financial capability significantly reduces the completeness of the documentation provided to potential bidders.

The tender is an open procedure, and e-procurement is indicated, promoting accessibility. The estimated value is disclosed. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria and detailed requirements for bidder capabilities means that the assessment process might not be entirely objective or transparent, potentially leading to a less fair competition. The short submission deadline also raises concerns about fairness.

The tender is active with a specified submission deadline and contract duration. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, but the estimated value is provided. The primary concern is the lack of explicit mention of e-submission, although 'E-Procurement' is listed as a characteristic. The contract start date is not specified.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated and appear logically consistent. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided for submission and opening are sequential. The CPV code and NUTS code are also present.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation criteria. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability aspects within this procurement process.