Skip to main content
Tenders

Technical design project "Panevėžys kindergarten "Rūta" interior premises and educational environment

Open
Deadline
13 days left
April 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7063366
Value
€35,455
Location
Panevezys County, Lithuania
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 09, 2026

Tender Opening

April 09, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€35,455
Duration
21 months
Location
Panevezys County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€131,412
Avg. Bids
3.9
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
98%
2,076 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Purpose of the design: to prepare the interior premises and educational environment of Panevėžys kindergarten "Rūta"
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

EBVPDZIP
EBVPD.7z

This document contains the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) request for the modernization of the "Rūta" kindergarten in Panevėžys, Lithuania, requiring bidders to provide information about themselves and their eligibility.

Pirkimo sąlygosDOC
Darželio Rūta projekto parengimas ir priežiūr...

This document contains the terms and conditions for a public procurement tender for the preparation of a technical design for the modernization of indoor and educational spaces at the Panevėžys kindergarten "Rūta".

NoticePDF
Notice_7063366.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for engineering design services for the modernization of internal premises and educational environment of the Panevėžys kindergarten "Rūta" in Lithuania.

Statinio projektavimo užduotisPDF
Statinio_projektavimo_užduotis_18-1790.pdf

This document contains the technical design task for the modernization of interior spaces and educational environment of the "Rūta" kindergarten in Panevėžys, outlining the scope of work, requirements, and procedures for the design project.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_7063366_1.xml

This document outlines the structure of a tender for the design of interior spaces and educational environments for the Panevėžys kindergarten "Rūta", requiring the submission of a complete tender file.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for engineering design services for a kindergarten modernization is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a standard open procedure. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value and specific evaluation criteria are notable omissions.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to the open procedure (2014/24/ES) and uses the correct CPV code. The presence of mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements suggests regulatory compliance. The submission deadline is within a reasonable timeframe for an open procedure, though the 'tender valid' period is standard. No disputes are reported.

Clarity80/100

The title and description clearly state the project's objective: preparing a technical design for kindergarten modernization. Key documents like the technical design task and terms and conditions are provided, offering a good level of detail. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, title, reference, CPV code, and contract duration. The estimated value is not disclosed, which impacts completeness. All required documents (5 total) are listed and appear to be available.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, promoting broad participation. The use of the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) is standard. Requirements are listed as general categories (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission), which is typical. There is no indication of requirements tailored to specific companies. Full document access is implied by the document list.

Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting electronic submission is possible. However, the 'No e-submission' flag in the checks contradicts this. The contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent. The duration is provided.

No e-submission (contradictory flag)
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, CPV, and deadlines are populated. The status is 'active', and no disputes are reported. Dates are logical, with the opening date following the submission deadline. The 'tender valid' period is consistent with typical procurement practices.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information. This suggests a lack of specific sustainability focus.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear project objective and title
Standard open procedure (2014/24/ES)
Availability of key tender documents
Correct CPV code provided

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing specific evaluation criteria
Potential ambiguity regarding e-submission

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the procurement.
2. Clearly specify the evaluation criteria to enhance transparency.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline