Skip to main content
Tenders

Portable printers (PPR-209)

Open
Deadline
4 days left
March 31, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7060556
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 31, 2026

Tender Opening

March 31, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
15 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€195,073
Avg. Bids
2.3
Competition
Low
SME Winners
97%
715 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Portable printers (EURODAC workstations)
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

1 IA PD BS (PPR-209)DOC
1 IA PD BS (PPR-209).docx

This document contains general provisions and requirements for bidders participating in a procurement process, including details on joint ventures, reliance on third-party capacities, and submission of supporting documents.

2 IA PD SS (PPR-209)DOC
2 IA PD SS (PPR-209).docx

This document contains the general terms and conditions for a goods purchase and sale agreement, outlining definitions, interpretation rules, and document hierarchy for a tender involving portable printers funded by the Border Management and Visa Policy financial instrument.

3 IA PD TS (PPR-209)DOC
3 IA PD TS (PPR-209).docx

This document outlines the technical specifications for a portable color printer, including weight, paper size, connectivity, resolution, battery capacity, and required accessories.

4 IA PD PF (PPR-209)DOC
4 IA PD PF (PPR-209).docx

This document contains various tables for bidders to fill out, including supplier details, required documents, information on subcontracting, grounds for exclusion, technical proposals, and financial offers for portable printers.

5 Nacionalinio saugumo reikalavimų atitikties deklaracijaDOC
5 Nacionalinio saugumo reikalavimų atitikties...

This document is a declaration of compliance with national security requirements for a bidder participating in the procurement of portable printers for EURODAC workstations.

NoticePDF
Notice_7060556.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the procurement of portable printers for EURODAC workstations in Lithuania.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_7060556_1.xml

This document contains the structure for a simplified open tender for portable printers, requiring a complete tender file submission.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for portable printers is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financing. It benefits from being EU-funded and utilizing e-procurement.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by having a clear procedure (open tender) and providing a CPV code. The provided documents suggest a structured process. However, the absence of a reveal date for submissions is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The tender provides a clear title, description, and technical specifications for the portable printers. The AI-extracted requirements list key areas bidders must address. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it unclear how bids will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, reference number, contract duration, and tender validity. Seven documents are provided, covering technical specifications, declarations, and submission forms. The estimated value is not disclosed, which impacts completeness.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting accessibility. All documents appear to be accessible, and the process is open. There are no explicit requirements tailored to specific companies, indicating a good level of fairness.

Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the 'Checks' section indicates 'No e-submission', which contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and the contract start date is not specified.

No e-submission (contradicts E-Procurement characteristic)
Financing info not detailed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and CPV code are populated. The dates provided for submission and opening are logical. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, contributing to good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is EU funded, which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information, limiting its sustainability score.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

EU Funded
E-Procurement characteristic
Clear technical specifications
Comprehensive set of required documents

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Estimated value not disclosed
Potential contradiction regarding e-submission

Recommendations

1. Specify evaluation criteria to enhance transparency.
2. Disclose the estimated value of the procurement.
3. Clarify the e-submission process to align with the e-procurement characteristic.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline